Skip to content

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

Close
AICPA-CIMA
  • AICPA & CIMA:
  • Home
  • CPE & Learning
  • My Account
Journal of Accountancy
  • TECH & AI
    • All articles
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Microsoft Excel
    • Information Security & Privacy

    Latest Stories

    • Incorporating prompt engineering into the accounting curriculum
    • Create a dynamic to-do list with Excel’s checkboxes
    • Another way to manage authentication texts
  • TAX
    • All articles
    • Corporations
    • Employee benefits
    • Individuals
    • IRS procedure

    Latest Stories

    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
    • Taxpayer’s circumstances do not warrant equitable tolling
    • When does debt become worthless?
  • PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
    • All articles
    • Diversity, equity & inclusion
    • Human capital
    • Firm operations
    • Practice growth & client service

    Latest Stories

    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
    • California issues draft guidance for climate risk disclosure
    • Business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns
  • FINANCIAL REPORTING
    • All articles
    • FASB reporting
    • IFRS
    • Private company reporting
    • SEC compliance and reporting

    Latest Stories

    • SEC accepting Professional Accounting Fellow applications
    • SEC names new chief accountant
    • SEC ends legal defense of its climate rules
  • AUDIT
    • All articles
    • Attestation
    • Audit
    • Compilation and review
    • Peer review
    • Quality Management

    Latest Stories

    • AICPA unveils new QM resources to help firms meet Dec. 15 deadline
    • 8 steps to build your firm’s quality management system on time
    • Auditing Standards Board proposes a new fraud standard
  • MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
    • All articles
    • Business planning
    • Human resources
    • Risk management
    • Strategy

    Latest Stories

    • Business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns
    • AICPA & CIMA Business Resilience Toolkit — levers for action
    • Economic pessimism grows, but CFOs have strategic responses
  • Home
  • News
  • Magazine
  • Podcast
  • Topics
Advertisement
  1. newsletter
  2. Extra Credit
Extra Credit Cover

How to help students who are ‘Perpetual Analyzers’

These students need help with coming to conclusions.

By Susan Wolcott, CPA, Ph.D.
September 10, 2019

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2019. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Related

August 13, 2019

How to help students who are ‘Biased Jumpers’

July 16, 2019

How to help students who are ‘Confused Fact-Finders’

June 11, 2019

Guide students toward better critical thinking

TOPICS

  • Accounting Education

Editor’s note: This is the fourth in a series of articles to help you explore student thinking, and how critical thinking is taught and learned, to better enable you to help your students thrive in today’s complex business and accounting environment. The first article provides an introduction to the series, while the second and third discuss the “Confused Fact-Finder” and “Biased Jumper” stages of critical thinking development.

This series of articles provides specific recommendations for helping students improve their critical thinking within accounting courses. By directly addressing the beliefs about knowledge and learning that students hold at each stage of their critical thinking development, accounting educators can increase both students’ motivation to learn critical thinking skills and the effectiveness of the learning methods they use. This article addresses students at the third stage of development, which I nicknamed the “Perpetual Analyzer.”

“Perpetual Analyzer” thinking and how to recognize it

At the “Perpetual Analyzer” stage of development, students demonstrate many desirable critical thinking skills. They are capable of understanding problems in a complex way, are aware of their own limitations and biases in understanding a problem, and actively seek to understand others’ viewpoints. They can logically and qualitatively evaluate the evidence and assumptions that underpin different perspectives. A minority of the students I have taught in undergraduate and master-level courses have demonstrated this pattern of thinking.

Although the reasoning skills of Perpetual Analyzers allow them to draw logical conclusions within a given perspective, they have great difficulty prioritizing factors to reach and defend a single “best” solution to a problem when more than one viable option exists. In the introduction to this series, I told a story about a partner of a CPA firm who stated, “We can’t afford to have our people sitting around, thinking all day.” I would guess that the partner was referring to people operating at the Perpetual Analyzer stage, who tend to get stuck in the process of analyzing and exploring the problem. Their difficulty arises in part because they have given up their previous “Biased Jumper” ways of thinking and have not yet developed a way to make decisions that controls for personal bias.

How can you recognize students who are operating at the Perpetual Analyzer level of thinking? Below are common signs.


The student:

  • Is unable to establish priorities for judging across alternatives
  • Is reluctant to select and defend a single overall solution as most viable, or selects a solution but unable to express adequate support for its superiority over other solutions
  • Writes overly long paper in attempt to demonstrate all aspects of analysis (unable to prioritize the most important issues and factors)
  • Jeopardizes class discussions by getting stuck on issues such as definitions

Source: Wolcott, S. K. (January 26, 2006). Steps for Better Thinking Performance Patterns [Online]. Available: www.WolcottLynch.com. Based in part on information from Reflective Judgment Scoring Manual With Examples (1985/1996) by K. S. Kitchener and P. M. King. Grounded in dynamic skill theory (Fischer and Bidell, 1998; Fischer and Pruyne, 2002).

Advertisement

Because students’ beliefs about knowledge drive their critical thinking approaches, our challenge as faculty members is to alter their underlying beliefs about how the world works. Here are some suggestions for how to do this.

How to help Perpetual Analyzers develop

The most effective approach is to help these students move to the next-higher pattern of thinking, which I’ve nicknamed the “Pragmatic Performer.” At this next stage, students act in a practical way to reach and defend conclusions.

perpetual-analyzers


(Note: These patterns are based on Stages 5 and 6 in the
reflective judgment model developed by P.M. King and K. S. Kitchener. For details, see my freely available Faculty Handbook: Steps for Better Thinking. For a copy, send an email to swolcott@WolcottLynch.com.)

Perpetual Analyzers try to remain as objective as possible while they evaluate a problem from different perspectives. While objectivity is desirable for good critical thinking, it can interfere with students’ abilities to choose and defend a single best solution. Thus, Perpetual Analyzers exhibit “analysis paralysis”: They delve more deeply into detailed (and often unimportant) aspects of the problem as they avoid reaching a conclusion. They might also cite a conclusion without giving it adequate support. These students need to learn how to identify priorities they can apply for evaluating across competing solutions/perspectives within the context of the problem.

Teaching/learning recommendations

Here are some ways to teach students how to prioritize information when addressing an open-ended problem. Encourage them to:

  • Clarify the most important issues and factors in a situation. Faculty often assume that students who can thoroughly and objectively analyze information can readily identify the most important issues, risks, evidence, stakeholders, and so on in a given situation. However, remaining objective while also establishing priorities requires the ability to move back and forth between the details of a problem and the overall situation. In homework assignments and classroom discussions, it is helpful to have students consider questions such as these: Who are the key stakeholders in this situation, and which issues are most important to those stakeholders? For this problem, which details and evidence need to be addressed, and which are less important — and, therefore, should be set aside? Why are the priorities for this situation different from those for another similar situation?
  • Choose and explain assumptions and decision criteria. Because Perpetual Analyzers are trying to maintain objectivity and avoid bias, they often have difficulty establishing priorities that lead to appropriate assumptions and decision criteria. You can help these students by having them compare and contrast the terms bias and priority and by identifying each characteristic in sample responses to an accounting problem. It is also helpful for these students to gain greater comfort through practice. For example, you can ask students to identify reasonable assumptions or decision criteria as a homework problem, and then have students compare and discuss the reasons for their choices in small group and/or whole class discussions. As Perpetual Analyzers gain greater experience considering alternative sets of assumptions and decision criteria, they will become more comfortable making their own choices.
  • Adapt communications for different audiences. Perpetual Analyzers not only have difficulty prioritizing details when analyzing a problem but also have difficulty prioritizing information when communicating to an audience. Ask students to practice visualizing and modifying communications for different audiences when writing about open-ended problems. It is also helpful to divide assignment requirements into two parts. In the first part, ask students to address the needs of an audience within a (relatively short) paper length limit. In the second part, ask students to explain how they decided which information to include/exclude in the first part. I have found that this assignment design reduces student stress about reducing details in the first part of the assignment and provides me with information in the second part for giving students useful feedback.

Look for the next article in this series, which will address issues in the typical accounting classroom, populated by students operating at different stages of critical thinking development.

Susan Wolcott, CPA, CMA, Ph.D., is a founder of WolcottLynch, which conducts research and develops educational resources for critical thinking development. She has taught accounting courses at seven universities and is currently a visiting professor at the Indian School of Business. To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact senior editor Courtney Vien at Courtney.Vien@aicpa-cima.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

latest news

September 4, 2025

Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips

September 4, 2025

California issues draft guidance for climate risk disclosure

September 4, 2025

Business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns

September 3, 2025

New: Digital assets practice aid addresses auditing of lending, borrowing

August 29, 2025

Guidance on research or experimental expenditures under H.R. 1 issued

Advertisement

Most Read

The No. 1 risk to retirement – and one way to guard against it
Tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Billy Long out as IRS commissioner after less than two months
Calculating AI’s impact on CPAs: New study quantifies time savings
AICPA unveils new QM resources to help firms meet Dec. 15 deadline
Advertisement

Podcast

September 4, 2025

Summing up economic sentiment and concerns about inflation and tariffs

August 29, 2025

Take a bold leap instead of a tentative step

August 28, 2025

Mark Koziel Q&A: Talent, sense of community, profession opportunities

Features

Calming nervous clients nearing retirement
Calming nervous clients nearing retirement

Calming nervous clients nearing retirement

7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs
7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs

7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs

Building a better CPA firm: Stepping up service offerings
Multi-colored plus signs

Building a better CPA firm: Stepping up service offerings

2025 tax software survey
Smiley, frowney, and neutral faces for Tax Software Survey.

2025 tax software survey

SPONSORED REPORT

Smart Strategies in Data Security and Risk Management

In an increasingly digital profession, data security has become one of the most critical challenges facing finance and accounting professionals today. Stay up to date with practical guidance to help you mitigate these risks and strengthen your security posture.

From The Tax Adviser

August 30, 2025

2025 tax software survey

August 30, 2025

Are you doing all you can to keep the cash method for your clients?

July 31, 2025

Current developments in S corporations

July 31, 2025

Paid student-athletes: Tax implications for universities and donors

MAGAZINE

September 2025

September 2025

September 2025
August 2025

August 2025

August 2025
July 2025

July 2025

July 2025
June 2025

June 2025

June 2025
May 2025

May 2025

May 2025
April 2025

April 2025

April 2025
March 2025

March 2025

March 2025
February 2025

February 2025

February 2025
January 2025

January 2025

January 2025
December 2024

December 2024

December 2024
November 2024

November 2024

November 2024
October 2024

October 2024

October 2024
view all

View All

http://JofA_Default_Mag_cover_small_official_blue

PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

Coming soon: Learn about important news

CPA LETTER DAILY EMAIL

CPA Letter Logo

Subscribe to the daily CPA Letter

Stay on top of the biggest news affecting the profession every business day. Follow this link to your marketing preferences on aicpa-cima.com to subscribe. If you don't already have an aicpa-cima.com account, create one for free and then navigate to your marketing preferences.

Connect

  • X Logo JofA on X
  • facebook JofA on Facebook

HOME

  • News
  • Monthly issues
  • Podcast
  • A&A Focus
  • PFP Digest
  • Academic Update
  • Topics
  • RSS feed rss feed
  • Site map

ABOUT

  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Submit an article
  • Editorial calendar
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & conditions

SUBSCRIBE

  • Academic Update
  • CPE Express

AICPA & CIMA SITES

  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Global Engagement Center
  • Financial Management (FM)
  • The Tax Adviser
  • AICPA Insights
  • Global Career Hub
AICPA & CIMA

© 2025 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved.

Reliable. Resourceful. Respected.