Skip to content

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

Close
AICPA-CIMA
  • AICPA & CIMA:
  • Home
  • CPE & Learning
  • My Account
Journal of Accountancy
  • TECH & AI
    • All articles
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Microsoft Excel
    • Information Security & Privacy

    Latest Stories

    • Incorporating prompt engineering into the accounting curriculum
    • Create a dynamic to-do list with Excel’s checkboxes
    • Another way to manage authentication texts
  • TAX
    • All articles
    • Corporations
    • Employee benefits
    • Individuals
    • IRS procedure

    Latest Stories

    • Global tax deal could hurt US companies, says letter requesting OECD guidance
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
    • Taxpayer’s circumstances do not warrant equitable tolling
  • PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
    • All articles
    • Diversity, equity & inclusion
    • Human capital
    • Firm operations
    • Practice growth & client service

    Latest Stories

    • Global tax deal could hurt US companies, says letter requesting OECD guidance
    • Few companies strategically using risk management
    • Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
  • FINANCIAL REPORTING
    • All articles
    • FASB reporting
    • IFRS
    • Private company reporting
    • SEC compliance and reporting

    Latest Stories

    • SEC accepting Professional Accounting Fellow applications
    • SEC names new chief accountant
    • SEC ends legal defense of its climate rules
  • AUDIT
    • All articles
    • Attestation
    • Audit
    • Compilation and review
    • Peer review
    • Quality Management

    Latest Stories

    • AICPA unveils new QM resources to help firms meet Dec. 15 deadline
    • 8 steps to build your firm’s quality management system on time
    • Auditing Standards Board proposes a new fraud standard
  • MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
    • All articles
    • Business planning
    • Human resources
    • Risk management
    • Strategy

    Latest Stories

    • Business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns
    • AICPA & CIMA Business Resilience Toolkit — levers for action
    • Economic pessimism grows, but CFOs have strategic responses
  • Home
  • News
  • Magazine
  • Podcast
  • Topics
Advertisement
  1. newsletter
  2. Extra Credit
Extra Credit Cover

Reactions to the revised CPA Exam

Faculty, test-takers, and exam creators share their thoughts on the revised version of the CPA Exam.

By Lea Hart
January 9, 2018

Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2018. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.

Related

January 4, 2018

New, user-friendly software coming to the CPA Exam

August 21, 2017

CPA Exam advice from top scorers

June 19, 2017

How the CPA Exam is scored

TOPICS

  • Accounting Education

It’s been just under a year since the rollout of the revised CPA Exam. In keeping with the evolution of the accounting profession, the new version of the exam focuses more on critical thinking and analysis and includes more task-based simulations, leading many exam-takers to devote even more time to studying. But what do students and faculty think of the new exam? Here, they share their feedback and offer a few words of advice for future exam-takers.

Why the scores need to be taken with a grain of salt

Results from the revised exam show similar or better pass rates as compared to the previous version. However, those results need to be kept in context, noted John Mattar, director–Psychometrics & Research with the Public Accounting Examinations Team for the AICPA.

“If you just looked at the percentage of those who took the test and passed, [scores do] look pretty consistent [with previous years],” Mattar said.

However, he noted, direct comparisons can’t always be made between versions of an exam. The new exam has a different structure and some changes in the content and skills assessed.

It’s not possible to know if those who took the revised exam in these first few quarters are representative of everyone who is going to take it, Mattar said.

It’s also important to consider who took the test just before the changes were implemented.

“If you look at the pass rates for end of 2016, and beginning of 2017, they were a little lower than the historic trends,” Mattar said. “When you launch a new exam, more people go to take the old exam before the new exam is launched. Our volumes were up pretty substantially at end of 2016 and beginning of 2017.” The increased numbers of exam takers during that time may have affected pass rates if some candidates took the old exam earlier than they might otherwise have and were less prepared, he noted.

Advertisement

Extra preparation seems to have worked

Patrick Kelly, Ph.D., professor of accountancy at Providence College School of Business, said his students devoted more time to preparing for the revised version of the exam, due to the perceived increase in difficulty of the new version. That work seems to be paying off.

“Our students seem to be experiencing similar levels of success as prior graduates from our program,” Kelly said. “Most appear to have a positive experience and ultimately pass the exam.”

Like the previous version, many students talked about the Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR) section posing the greatest challenge, Kelly said.

Revised exam was more difficult than expected

Roshawn Kintaudi, CPA, an audit senior associate at Sadler, Gibb & Associates LLC, passed all four sections of the revised exam on the first try.

“Overall, I believe that the exam was harder than I expected,” he said. “As a first-time exam-taker, I felt as if the best way to succeed on each exam was to review the AICPA Blueprints for each exam and allocate hours of studying based on certain topics that were more likely to be tested.” He said that after taking each part of the exam, he “learned that time management, attention to detail, and critical thinking” were also crucial to success.

Kintaudi said he thinks the revised exam challenges candidates to quickly solve problems by “assessing whether they can effectively research issues in a timely manner and arrive at a reasonable conclusion.”

“In my opinion, the skills that are assessed on the exam are imperative for accounting professionals to master in order to be successful in their careers,” he said.

Advertisement

Already, Kintaudi said he’s found these skills to be essential in his own career. He has needed to research guidance about complex debt and equity-based transactions and report his findings to colleagues and clients.

 “After studying for and passing the CPA exam,” he observed, “I felt more comfortable performing the procedures in my professional career.”

Breadth of material covered can make studying a challenge

Victoria Adams, a student in the MBA program at the University of Alaska–Fairbanks, is in the process of taking the exam. She failed Regulation (REG) and Auditing and Attestation (AUD), but still felt she did better than expected walking out of the exam.

“While this was my first go-round, I would agree that this new test may be more challenging because you cannot rely on memorization and have to really be familiar with the material,” Adams said.

“My study materials prepared me for the layout of the exam and what to expect. However, the breadth of the topics made it difficult to know what to spend more time studying for,” she continued. “I think that overall it was harder than I expected.”

A mixed bag

Nolan Huysmans, a student in the Master of Science in Accounting program at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, passed AUD on his first attempt and took Business Environment and Concepts (BEC) in December.

Like others, he spent more time preparing, and said he had a mixed reaction after taking AUD.

Advertisement

“There were stretches of the exam that I found significantly easier than I was expecting, but then there were other parts where I really wasn’t as confident in how to respond to what was being asked,” Huysmans said.

While none of the questions caught him off-guard, Huysmans said there were a few multiple-choice questions and one simulation that were more in-depth and difficult than anything he had studied.

Some challenging multiple-choice questions

John Garavento, tax associate with RSM US LLP, found the exam to be as difficult as he expected. Some multiple-choice questions were especially challenging, he said.

“There were several questions where I was able to narrow it down to two choices that seemed to have equal merit depending on how the question was interpreted,” he said.

At the time interviews for this article were conducted, he’d taken FAR and AUD, and found AUD to be the more difficult section.

Tips from exam-takers

Several exam-takers offered a few pieces of advice to those preparing for the exam:

  • Focus on simulations and multiple choice. While the exam does contain additional simulations, Garavento said exam-takers shouldn’t lose sight of preparing for the multiple-choice questions as well. “Because the new exam gives equal weight to multiple-choice questions and task-based simulations, it would be easier to overlook the multiple-choice sections, which I think would be a mistake,” Garavento said.
  • Hone your time management and critical thinking skills. Focusing on one question for too long may cause candidates to rush through other questions, Kintaudi said. Make a quick assessment of all questions to determine how much time to allocate to each. Critical thinking will be important because “candidates [will need] to completely assess whether all data presented is relevant, and whether any additional information is needed to properly answer each question,” he said.
  • Study in a way that works for you. “I made sure to become familiar with, and understand, the areas that were changing the most,” Huysmans said. He suggested that students create a study plan that works best for them and follow it consistently. “At this point, candidates should know how they study [best] and learn material,” he said. “Don’t feel pressure to deviate from that.”

Lea Hart is a freelance writer based in Durham, N.C. To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact lead editor Courtney Vien, a senior editor for magazines and newsletters at the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.

Advertisement
Advertisement

latest news

September 8, 2025

Global tax deal could hurt US companies, says letter requesting OECD guidance

September 8, 2025

Few companies strategically using risk management

September 4, 2025

Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips

September 4, 2025

California issues draft guidance for climate risk disclosure

September 4, 2025

Business outlook brightens somewhat despite trade, inflation concerns

Advertisement

Most Read

The No. 1 risk to retirement – and one way to guard against it
Tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Billy Long out as IRS commissioner after less than two months
Calculating AI’s impact on CPAs: New study quantifies time savings
AICPA unveils new QM resources to help firms meet Dec. 15 deadline
Advertisement

Podcast

September 4, 2025

Summing up economic sentiment and concerns about inflation and tariffs

August 29, 2025

Take a bold leap instead of a tentative step

August 28, 2025

Mark Koziel Q&A: Talent, sense of community, profession opportunities

Features

Calming nervous clients nearing retirement
Calming nervous clients nearing retirement

Calming nervous clients nearing retirement

7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs
7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs

7 retirement tips for small firm CPAs

Building a better CPA firm: Stepping up service offerings
Multi-colored plus signs

Building a better CPA firm: Stepping up service offerings

2025 tax software survey
Smiley, frowney, and neutral faces for Tax Software Survey.

2025 tax software survey

FROM THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

Multi-colored plus signs

Building a better CPA firm: Stepping up service offerings

A key step in business model modernization is determining how to implement services that satisfy clients and employees.

From The Tax Adviser

August 30, 2025

2025 tax software survey

August 30, 2025

Are you doing all you can to keep the cash method for your clients?

July 31, 2025

Current developments in S corporations

July 31, 2025

Paid student-athletes: Tax implications for universities and donors

MAGAZINE

September 2025

September 2025

September 2025
August 2025

August 2025

August 2025
July 2025

July 2025

July 2025
June 2025

June 2025

June 2025
May 2025

May 2025

May 2025
April 2025

April 2025

April 2025
March 2025

March 2025

March 2025
February 2025

February 2025

February 2025
January 2025

January 2025

January 2025
December 2024

December 2024

December 2024
November 2024

November 2024

November 2024
October 2024

October 2024

October 2024
view all

View All

http://JofA_Default_Mag_cover_small_official_blue

PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

Coming soon: Learn about important news

CPA LETTER DAILY EMAIL

CPA Letter Logo

Subscribe to the daily CPA Letter

Stay on top of the biggest news affecting the profession every business day. Follow this link to your marketing preferences on aicpa-cima.com to subscribe. If you don't already have an aicpa-cima.com account, create one for free and then navigate to your marketing preferences.

Connect

  • X Logo JofA on X
  • facebook JofA on Facebook

HOME

  • News
  • Monthly issues
  • Podcast
  • A&A Focus
  • PFP Digest
  • Academic Update
  • Topics
  • RSS feed rss feed
  • Site map

ABOUT

  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Submit an article
  • Editorial calendar
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & conditions

SUBSCRIBE

  • Academic Update
  • CPE Express

AICPA & CIMA SITES

  • AICPA-CIMA.com
  • Global Engagement Center
  • Financial Management (FM)
  • The Tax Adviser
  • AICPA Insights
  • Global Career Hub
AICPA & CIMA

© 2025 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved.

Reliable. Resourceful. Respected.