- news
- ETHICS
New AICPA technical corrections clarify independence requirements
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2018. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
PEEC exposure draft seeks to clarify requirements for SSAE engagements
Professional liability Q&A: AI disclosure, retired-partner risk, and more
AICPA seeks feedback on independence rules related to private equity
TOPICS
The AICPA has issued technical corrections to the definition of “covered member” in the AICPA Professional Standards and the independence rules for agreed-upon procedure engagements performed in accordance with the Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAEs).
Neither of the technical corrections represents a change in position on the part of the AICPA; rather, both corrections fix typographical errors that occurred when previous updates were published.
One technical correction clarifies that 10 hours is the threshold for provision of nonattest services to an attest client within a fiscal year at which a partner, partner equivalent, or manager is considered a “covered member” (ET §0.400.12) in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.
The other technical correction clarifies that independence would be impaired in an agreed-upon procedure engagement under the SSAEs if a firm had a material financial relationship with the responsible party or parties that was covered by any of the following interpretations of the “Independence Rule” (ET §1.200.001):
- Paragraphs .01 and .02 of “Overview of Financial Interests” (ET §1.240.010).
- “Trustee or Executor” (ET §1.245.010).
- “Joint Closely Held Investments” (ET §1.265.020).
- “Loans” (ET §1.260.010, prior reference: Paragraph .13 of ET §101).
The technical corrections take effect immediately.
— Ken Tysiac (Kenneth.Tysiac@aicpa-cima.com) is a JofA editorial director.