- news
- FINANCIAL REPORTING
FASB Q&As discuss financial reporting implications of tax law
By Ken Tysiac
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2018. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
September 25, 2025
Professional liability risks related to Form 1065, CPA firm acquisitions
September 24, 2025
Paper tax refund checks on the way out as IRS shifts to electronic payments
September 23, 2025
IRS keeps per diem rates unchanged for business travel year starting Oct. 1
FASB addressed financial reporting issues related to P.L. 115-97, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, in four staff Q&As posted to its website Monday.
The Q&As address:
- Whether to discount the tax liability on the deemed repatriation. FASB’s staff believes that the tax liability on the deemed repatriation of earnings should not be discounted.
- Whether to discount alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits that become refundable. FASB’s staff notes that GAAP prohibits discounting deferred taxes, and accordingly, any AMT credit carryforwards presented as a deferred tax asset would not be discounted.
- Accounting for the base-erosion anti-abuse tax. FASB’s staff believes that an entity that is subject to base-erosion anti-abuse tax should measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the statutory tax rate under the regular tax system.
- Accounting for global intangible low-tax income. FASB’s staff believes that it is permissible for financial statement preparers to use one of two interpretations in this accounting. The staff notes that an entity must disclose its accounting policy related to global intangible low-tax income inclusions in accordance with GAAP.
FASB also issued a staff Q&A document on Jan. 11 that states that FASB’s staff would not object if private companies and not-for-profits voluntarily apply SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.
— Ken Tysiac (Kenneth.Tysiac@aicpa-cima.com) is a JofA editorial director.