- news
- FINANCIAL REPORTING
FASB, IASB tentatively agree on two financial instruments items
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2012. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
California issues draft guidance for climate risk disclosure
SEC accepting Professional Accounting Fellow applications
Calculating AI’s impact on CPAs: New study quantifies time savings
Tentative, joint decisions reached by FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on Tuesday will affect the business model assessment for classifying financial assets at amortized costs, and bifurcation of financial assets and financial liabilities.
According to a summary posted on FASB’s website, the boards tentatively made decisions related to two specific topics in the classification and measurement portion of their project on accounting for financial instruments.
Tentatively, the boards decided that financial assets would qualify for amortized cost if held in a business model whose objective is to hold them in order to collect contractual cash flows. The boards also tentatively clarified the primary objective of the term “hold to collect,” providing implementation guidance on the types of business activities and the frequency and types of sales that would make financial assets ineligible for amortized cost measurement.
In addition, the boards tentatively decided that financial assets containing cash flows that are not solely principal and interest would not be eligible for bifurcation. Those assets instead would be classified and measured in their entirety at fair value through net income. Financial liabilities would be bifurcated using the existing requirements in IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, and U.S. GAAP.
The IASB decided that the “own credit” guidance in IFRS 9 will be retained; FASB will discuss “own credit” presentation requirements at a future meeting where the IASB will not be present.
Accounting for financial instruments is one of three remaining Memorandum of Understanding projects on which the boards are attempting to reach converged standards. Revenue recognition and leases are the others. The boards also have a joint project on insurance.
The boards were scheduled to continue meeting today and Thursday, discussing impairment for financial instruments and insurance contracts.
—Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a JofA senior editor.
