- news
- AUDITING
Court of Appeals Upholds PCAOB, SOX Constitutionality
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2008. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
New: Digital assets practice aid addresses auditing of lending, borrowing
PCAOB postpones effective date for new quality control system
A&A Focus recap: M&A trends, non-GAAP frameworks, and how quality management and peer review intersect
TOPICS
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court decision on the constitutionality of the PCAOB and Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which spawned the regulator.
The plaintiffs in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB argued that SOX and the PCAOB violate the appointments clause, separation of powers and nondelegation principles of the Constitution because PCAOB board members hold significant regulatory power yet are appointed by the SEC, not by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The appeals court held 2-1 that the manner in which PCAOB board members are appointed and overseen under Sarbanes-Oxley is constitutional. SEC commissioners, who are appointed by presidential nomination with Senate consent, “exercise comprehensive control over Board procedures and decisions and Board members. For instance, the Commission approves all Board rules,” Justice Judith W. Rogers wrote for the majority in the appellate court ruling.
