- news
- AUDITING
Guidance for Dealing With Electronic Confirmations
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2008. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
New: Digital assets practice aid addresses auditing of lending, borrowing
PCAOB postpones effective date for new quality control system
A&A Focus recap: M&A trends, non-GAAP frameworks, and how quality management and peer review intersect
TOPICS
The AICPA’s Auditing Standards Board has revised Auditing Interpretation no. 1, Use of Electronic Confirmations, of SAS no. 67, The Confirmation Process (AU section 330). The interpretation has been revised to provide guidance on the use of electronic confirmations and their reliability in the confirmation process.
Auditors are likely to work more with electronic confirmations as the financial sector shifts away from accepting paper confirmation requests. One example of the shift came Oct. 1 when Bank of America stopped responding to paper confirmation requests. BofA will only respond to confirmation requests submitted electronically via a designated third-party service provider.
The AICPA’s audit and attest and technical hotline staffs created a question and answer document regarding electronic confirmations and how the Bank of America decision and others like it may affect audits. The Q&A is available here.
