- column
- Letters
CBT Too Easy? Think Again
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2008. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
New: Digital assets practice aid addresses auditing of lending, borrowing
PCAOB postpones effective date for new quality control system
A&A Focus recap: M&A trends, non-GAAP frameworks, and how quality management and peer review intersect
TOPICS
The concerns about how easy the new CPA exam is, expressed in the letter “ CBT: Too Easy? ” ( JofA , Sept.05, page 12), are valid but unnecessary. I took the last paper and pencil exam in November 2003. The exam was very difficult, and I was able to get credit on only two parts. I finished the other two parts now computer-based in 2004 and became a CPA in 2005.
Having experienced both versions of the exam, I can tell you the CBT format is much more rigorous. Time pressures have increased, content has expanded and simulations have been added. You see an increase in passing rates because people now have time to focus on one part at a time. However, the trick is having the endurance and focus to pass the entire exam during an 18-month window. Not many people have the stamina required to study for the test that way. The result is that candidates with less capability are weeded out. The bottom line is that if the exam was easier you would not see the drop in candidates that followed its implementation.
The new CPA exam, as all previous versions, is challenging and serves well to protect the public and the profession.
Jose M. Jimenez, CPA
Horseheads, N.Y.
