- column
- Top Line
Nonprofits Adopt Governing Policies
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2008. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
Fraud and technology: How to handle the double-edged sword
Writing an effective AI prompt for an audit
IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
TOPICS
Since the implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley, board governance policies at not-for-profit organizations have dramatically changed, especially when it comes to whistleblower and conflict-of-interest policies.
Of the 89% of organizations that have a conflict-of-interest policy in place, more than nine out of 10 require board members to sign the policy and more than two-thirds (68%) have executive management sign—an increase from 50% in 2003. Requirements for committee members to sign were also up this year—41% vs. 29% in 2006.
Nearly 70% of organizations had whistleblower policies. Whistleblower complaints are most often submitted to the chairman of the audit committee (in 21% of organizations), legal counsel (19%) or executive management (18%).
Other popular board governance policy changes included:
Implementation of accounting policies
Revision of investment policy
Establishment of audit committee
Update of record-retention policy
Establishment of code of ethics
Establishment of policy for board members to review Form 990/990-T
Source: Grant Thornton LLP’s National Board Governance Survey for Not-for-Profit Organizations, www.grantthornton.com .
