- column
- Letters
Audit Purchases to Check Revenue
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2008. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
Dealing with natural disasters: How to avoid fraudulent activities
Mitigate or exacerbate fraud risk? Culture’s critical role
TOPICS
I just took your test, “What Is Your Fraud IQ?,” (Dec. 07, page 56). I received a score of 90%. However, I do want to take issue with the wording in one of the questions. In 10(a), you described “Cost of Goods Sold” as an account. Technically, that’s not accurate. Cost of goods sold is a subtotal made up of a number of accounts, including the account “purchases.” (Although, oftentimes, cost of goods sold is reflected as one number on a published condensed financial statement.) Therefore, one way to validate fictitious revenues (and also unrecorded revenues) is to audit purchases. This type of so-called “backward auditing” is not only commonly used for the purpose of validating sales, it is commonly used by government agencies for the same purpose, especially with sales tax audits. Gary M. Barnbaum, CPA
Woodland Hills, Calif.