A Pink Slip and a Vest


In a revenue ruling, the IRS further standardized a benchmark it first proposed in 1991 for determining when a partial termination of a defined contribution retirement plan under IRC section 411(d)(3)(A) has occurred. The provision comes into play often when employers downsize, as in the scenario of the ruling, 2007-43, which was released in June. Under the statute, a termination or partial termination of a qualified plan results in the immediate vesting of all affected employees. Corresponding regulations provide only a facts-and-circumstances standard for determining how many layoffs constitute a partial termination. “So vague a regulation is no help to anyone,” said the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Matz v. Household International Tax Reduction Investment Plan , 94 AFTR 2d 2004-6781 (2004). The court reached back 13 years for a benchmark in an amicus brief filed by the IRS in another case. In the earlier case, Weil v. Retirement Plan Administrative Committee , 67 AFTR 2d 91-1131 (2nd Circuit, 1991), the IRS said a partial termination may be presumed to have occurred when severance turnover is at least 20% of participating employees. In the recent revenue ruling, the IRS applied that standard to an employer that closed one of its four business locations, laying off 23% of its plan participants.

FEATURE

Tackling TCJA changes this tax season

Return preparers must be ready for how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has modified many common features of individual and business returns.

PODCAST

Why CPAs can’t wait on automation tools

What do accounting firms waiting on others to develop AI, automation, and data analytics tools have in common with a baseball fan sitting in a stadium filling with water at an exponential rate? The answer could determine your firm’s fate.