- column
- TAX MATTERS
A Pink Slip and a Vest
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2007. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
Details on IRS prop. regs. on tip income deduction
AICPA urges IRS to modernize estate and trust tax forms
‘We’re still the thinkers’ — a reminder for tax pros in the AI era
TOPICS
In a revenue ruling, the IRS further standardized a benchmark it first proposed in 1991 for determining when a partial termination of a defined contribution retirement plan under IRC section 411(d)(3)(A) has occurred. The provision comes into play often when employers downsize, as in the scenario of the ruling, 2007-43, which was released in June. Under the statute, a termination or partial termination of a qualified plan results in the immediate vesting of all affected employees. Corresponding regulations provide only a facts-and-circumstances standard for determining how many layoffs constitute a partial termination. “So vague a regulation is no help to anyone,” said the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Matz v. Household International Tax Reduction Investment Plan , 94 AFTR 2d 2004-6781 (2004). The court reached back 13 years for a benchmark in an amicus brief filed by the IRS in another case. In the earlier case, Weil v. Retirement Plan Administrative Committee , 67 AFTR 2d 91-1131 (2nd Circuit, 1991), the IRS said a partial termination may be presumed to have occurred when severance turnover is at least 20% of participating employees. In the recent revenue ruling, the IRS applied that standard to an employer that closed one of its four business locations, laying off 23% of its plan participants.