EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY | Clients who want
their beneficiaries to avoid
probate often place assets in trust. Many
CPAs are reluctant to take on being a
trustee, which is a time-consuming
responsibility. An alternative is to be a
third-party “trust protector” alongside a
professional trustee. CPAs are highly
qualified for the trust protector role
because they have the client’s confidence,
the right skill sets, a tax background and
an understanding of the client’s family
dynamics.
A trust protector
has contractual powers
(described in the trust document) to
assist in guiding both corporate
trustees and trust beneficiaries through
legal and tax complexities to realize
the trustor’s original intent. Using a
trust protector provides an added
safeguard over the actions of an
appointed corporate trustee. The concept
is common in offshore asset protection
planning.
A trust protector
can generally remove and
replace a trustee; terminate the trust;
change the situs of administration;
resolve co-trustee deadlocks or
beneficiary-trustee disputes; veto
investment decisions; and redirect trust
distributions or amend administrative
provisions and trust terms based on
unforeseen circumstances in the
beneficiaries’ lives or changes in law.
Few statutes define
and regulate the role of trust
protector, and only a few domestic
jurisdictions recognize it (Alaska,
Delaware, Idaho, South Dakota and
Wyoming). There is little domestic case
law to address issues such as who is
checking the trust protector’s powers,
the trustee’s role if those powers are
broad, or terms of succession for the
role.
Because the role is
not defined in most states,
there is potential legal liability.
Contentious beneficiaries could argue
that a protector acted imprudently or
improperly. Other drawbacks to be
managed include an uncertain fee
structure and the always-present issue
of uncertain timing.
Michael B. Allmon,
CPA, a partner at Michael B.
Allmon & Assoc. LLP CPAs, is the
founding chair of the California
Society of CPAs Estate Planning
Committee. His e-mail address is
mike@mbacpas.com
.
|
Clients who want their beneficiaries to
avoid the stress, expense and delay of probate
often place assets in trust. Increasingly they are
asking their CPAs in both public practice and
industry to act as trustees. However, many CPAs
are reluctant to take on the fiduciary
responsibility of being a trustee for several
reasons: They lack adequate infrastructure and
staff for trust administration; they are
inexperienced in trustee work, especially for real
estate and other nonliquid assets; and they are
uncertain about how to bill appropriately.
An alternative to acting as trustee is to be a
“trust protector” alongside a professional
trustee. This article will examine the basic
definition and duties of a trust protector, offer
reasons CPAs are an excellent fit for the trust
protector role, describe potential pitfalls of the
arrangement and their solutions, and suggest why
CPAs should want to act in this capacity.
FROM PLANNING TO PROTECTION
A trust protector is a third party (neither
trustor nor trustee) who has been granted
contractual powers to protect the terms of a
trust. The concept—relatively new for onshore
trusts—is common in offshore asset protection
planning. A trust protector can assist in guiding
both corporate trustees and trust beneficiaries
through legal and tax complexities to carry out
the client’s original intent. The idea has grown
in popularity in reaction to the increasingly
unpredictable nature of changing law and tax
policy. A trust protector’s authority lies
in the powers and duties spelled out in the trust
document (the contract). When the client uses a
trust protector, the main trustee becomes an
excluded fiduciary in those areas in which the
trust protector is empowered. Generally, trust
protector powers include some or all of the
following:
The ability to remove and replace a
trustee. The most common—often
the only—power of trust protectors is the ability
to replace a trustee who is unresponsive to the
needs of the beneficiaries or who is not
performing to the standard required by the trust’s
investment policy statement (IPS). The IPS
outlines how the trustee is to manage the trust’s
investment portfolio and addresses risk tolerance,
goals and asset allocations. It should be reviewed
periodically.
The power to change situs of
administration. The situs—the
trust’s legal “home,” which determines which
state’s laws will apply—is an important factor in
its administration. Sometimes estate planning
attorneys will recommend that a trust have a situs
in a state other than the one in which the trustor
lives. For instance, trusts sited in California
having non-California beneficiaries are subject to
a complex tax formula; using another state for the
situs could reduce the trust’s state income taxes.
Consult the trust’s attorney when a trust situs
differs from the trustor’s home state. Changes in
law occurring after the trust document has been
prepared also can make it advisable to move the
trust situs.
The power to resolve deadlocks between
co-trustees. This is sometimes
referred to as “tie-break” power.
Discretion to veto investment decisions,
redirect trust distributions or amend
administrative provisions and trust terms
based on unforeseen circumstances such as
divorce, irresponsibility or changes in law.
For instance, a trust protector
might decide that distributions to a beneficiary
who is in a temporary situation such as a divorce
or credit action, or who has become drug addicted,
should be modified. Changes in estate tax laws
also might provide reasonable grounds for the
protector to act to amend the trust document.
Ability to terminate the trust.
This might apply when the trust is
no longer large enough to warrant ongoing
administrative costs and continuing it is not in
the beneficiaries’ best interests. For example, I
am trustee of a trust (formerly a protector of
this trust) that had six beneficiaries. As each
beneficiary turned 21, his or her portion of the
trust was distributed. The last beneficiary is
much younger than the others, so the trust might
not have enough assets to cover its management
costs until that beneficiary turns 21. Based on
cost considerations, it would make sense to
distribute the remaining funds early.
Dispute resolution between beneficiaries
and the trustee. A trust
protector who arbitrates disputes can reduce the
trust’s litigation costs. As this list
shows, using a trust protector lets a trustor
extend control and build flexibility into an
otherwise rigid document long past the time when
he or she is deceased. Such capacity makes it more
likely that the spirit of the trust ultimately
will be carried out, even in a changing legal, tax
and economic environment. Another benefit
for the trustor is the trust’s ability to adapt
terms to the changing circumstances of
beneficiaries. Finally, a trust protector provides
an added safeguard over the actions of an
appointed corporate trustee, who may not know or
understand the client’s family dynamics.
NOT A CURE-ALL Many issues
that arise with the choice of a trustee also are
present in choosing a trust protector. For
instance, the inherent conflict of interest
between current beneficiaries and remaindermen
(inheritors whose estate vests after a prior
estate terminates) is not eliminated by the
addition of a trust protector, no matter how
sagacious the chosen party. (This is particularly
true if the trust protector is also a beneficiary
of the trust.) Nor is there much domestic case law
to address other unresolved issues such as:
Who is checking the powers wielded by
the trust protector?
What is the trustee’s ultimate role
if the trust protector’s powers are broad?
What are the terms of succession for
the role? Few statutes define and regulate
the role of trust protector, and only a few
domestic jurisdictions recognize the concept
(including Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, South Dakota
and Wyoming). To limit potential liability,
research the laws of your state to ensure you
fully understand the applicable laws.
WHY CPAs ARE A GOOD FIT
CPAs are highly qualified for the trust
protector role because they:
Have the client’s confidence.
A trust protector should be
unassailably objective, especially given
unresolved issues in the law and the inherent
conflict of interest between beneficiary and
remaindermen and between beneficiary and trustee.
Clients see their CPA as a reliable, trusted
adviser.
Have the knowledge. CPAs
have the education, training and experience to
handle the role. Their working knowledge of a
range of financial instruments can help them judge
how well the trust’s investment policy is being
executed.
Understand the clients.
Clients want someone who is
intimately familiar with the family’s financial
situation and long-term goals for passing wealth
to the next generation. For many families that
person is their accountant. Sometimes a family’s
CPA knows their financial situation as well or
better than they do.
Have a tax background.
CPAs’ knowledge of tax law puts them
in a good position to determine whether changes in
the law will necessitate changes to a client’s
trust.
| Case
Study: It Works Well for
Me Clients
sometimes ask me to act as
trustee of their estates, but
based on my executor and
trustee experiences, I think
CPAs can best serve clients by
monitoring the actions of the
primary fiduciary rather than
being the primary fiduciary.
In 1995, I became an
acting co-trustee and executor
for a client who died and left
a large and complex estate,
primarily in trust. My duties
included everything from
ensuring two steel companies
were managed efficiently (they
were responsible for the
section 6166 estate tax
payment plan that I negotiated
with the IRS), handling
potential toxic contamination
claims, settling document
disputes, dealing with
numerous tax matters (income,
estate and excise taxes) and
beneficiary issues (such as a
claim not authorized in the
documents) to the more usual
activities of a
fiduciary—investing and
communicating to all
beneficiaries. Once
the complex issues were
settled, my co-trustees
resigned. I remained as sole
trustee. I then found a
national trust company to
accept all liability for any
actions, to handle all matters
in a trustee role, and to
share the trustee’s
compensation with me. By our
agreement I voluntarily
created a trust protector role
for myself and gave up all
authority to act—except for
the power to replace that
trustee with anyone I chose,
including myself. My CPA firm
continued to provide tax
services to the trust.
So far, I have had to
replace the acting trustee
twice. The first time I
changed trustees because of a
change due to a merger of the
trust company. The second time
was due to an unresponsive and
difficult trustee (they were
not providing timely
accounting information that we
needed to prepare income tax
returns, nor were they meeting
our investment objectives, as
spelled out in the trust’s
investment policy statement).
I now ask my clients to
have their trust documents
name me as either trustee or
protector. When I am named as
trustee, I usually have the
ability to replace myself and
limit my responsibilities to
the role of a trust protector.
| |
PROTECTORS’ RISKS A trust
is a contract that offers tremendous potential
flexibility. Limited only by state law, the role
of trust protector can take on almost any
characteristic clients and their estate planning
advisers can imagine. But as with nearly all new
areas of practice, there are some risks for
pioneers. A CPA who chooses to act as a trust
protector will have to manage:
Potential legal liability.
Because the functions of a protector are not
defined in most states, contentious beneficiaries
could argue that a protector acted imprudently or
improperly. Before agreeing to act as your
client’s trust protector, consult an estate
planning attorney, research how your state views
trust protectors, and find out whether your
malpractice carrier will cover you in that
capacity.
Uncertain fee structure.
Still-developing laws in your state
may not address the issue of fees for trust
protectors. A protector’s fees might possibly be
covered by total trustee fees where such fees are
defined as “fair and reasonable.” To be safe,
obtain your client’s agreement to add language to
the trust document to ensure payment of your fees
for both fiduciary and accounting services for the
estate. Clients who ask you to serve will want you
to be motivated to act on their behalf and to be
properly paid for doing so. Weigh the potential
for earnings against potential liabilities in
accepting the trust protector role.
Uncertain timing. Neither
trustee nor trust protector can know when his or
her service to the client will begin. During busy
season a CPA would find it almost impossible to do
the job of trustee; because being a trust
protector is the less time-consuming role, the CPA
can still satisfy the client’s wish to obtain his
or her continued judgment in the disposition of
the estate even in the face of uncertain timing.
|
To limit potential liability:
Research how your
state views trust protectors,
and make sure you fully
understand the applicable laws
in your jurisdiction.
Consult an estate
planning attorney with knowledge
of your present and potential
area of practice.
Find out whether
your malpractice carrier will
cover you for trust protector
services.
| |
MANAGEABLE AND MEANINGFUL
CPAs are uniquely qualified to serve as
trust protectors, an engagement that offers an
attractive alternative to the nearly full-time job
of trustee. Performing the service in conjunction
with a corporate trustee will let you serve your
client’s best interests and solidify the
relationship. It shifts responsibility for
day-to-day trust administration to another entity,
yet gives you a degree of oversight. When
properly drafted within the trust document, the
balance of power between the two roles can serve
to best reflect the trustor’s original intent well
beyond his or her lifetime. The oversight of a
trust protector in domestic trusts is likely to
become a more common feature in years to come.
CPAs are well positioned to take on the role. |