- column
- Top Line
An Antidote to Excess
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2007. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
Report: AI speeds up work but fails to deliver real business value
How a CPA beat burnout after strokes, years of depression
Where CPAs stand on economic sentiment, what’s next for the JofA podcast
TOPICS
A recent study by Institutional Shareholder Services found CEO succession planning, which many public company boards have adopted over the past three years, to be a key practice in reducing excessive executive and golden parachute payments. The study suggests that without a succession plan in place, a board can become desperate to hire an outsider and is then more willing to offer a “candy store of incentives.”
| Index Group | Percentage of companies with a board-approved CEO succession plan, Jan. 2004 | Percentage of companies with a board-approved CEO succession plan, Jan. 2007 | Percentage- point change (rounded) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CGQ Universe 1 | 2% | 28% | +26 |
| Russell 3000 | 12% | 64% | +52 |
| S&P 400 | 38% | 90% | +52 |
| S&P 500 | 65% | 96% | +32 |
| S&P 600 | 20% | 82% | +62 |
| Grand Total | 14% | 54% | +39 |
1. 5,000 public companies tracked by ISS’ Corporate Governance Quotient
Source: Exit Pay: Best Practices in Practice, The ISS Center for Corporate Governance, 2007, www.issproxy.com/pdf/ExitPay2007.pdf.
