EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY | More CPAs are finding
themselves working with foreign
statements. As progress is made in
convergence and harmonization between FASB
and the IASB, the interpretation of
foreign financial statements should become
easier. CPAs in the United States should
watch these developments carefully and
familiarize themselves with IFRSs.
Users should be
ready to adjust their
expectations about language, currency,
accounting practices, methods and
presentation when working with foreign
statements.
Even if a company’s
statements have been audited,
CPAs should be aware that the
sophistication and enforcement of
accounting rules vary significantly by
country.
Approximately half
of the countries in the world
have adopted international standards for
publicly listed companies. Although the
United States is not one of them, FASB
and the IASB are working on convergence
projects.
Many domestic CPA
firms can, through their
international alliances and networks,
help U.S.-based CPAs in business and
industry understand foreign financial
statements.
Cultural
differences often make foreign
statements prepared using
U.S. GAAP quite different from
statements of U.S.-based companies. CPAs
should not accept anything at face
value.
Susan M. Sorensen,
CPA, PhD, has 30 years of
public accounting experience and is an
assistant professor of accounting, and
Donald L. Kyle,
CPA, PhD, is a professor of
accounting, both at the University of
Houston—Clear Lake. Their e-mail
addresses are
sorensen@uhcl.edu
and
kyle@uhcl.edu
, respectively.
|
Your Monday is off to a reasonably good
start. The improvements you made last year to your
company’s financial reporting system are paying
off. You’re getting data faster and your boss, the
president, is delighted with the new reports you
created. But this morning’s call is not a request
for yet another report. “Did you see what
we’re paying for bearings for the new 800s?”
blurts your boss. “Every time we turn around, our
domestic supplier hikes prices. I’ve found a new
supplier, and it’s for sale.” “Good,” you
reply. “Where is it located?” “Ukraine,”
he says. “And I want you to take a look at its
financials. They’re in English.” If you
have not already experienced this situation, you
may soon. Globalization, once the exclusive realm
of America’s largest companies, is now a reality
for companies of all sizes—so all financial
managers and CPAs must be prepared to work with
foreign financial statements. You may need to
include information from foreign statements in
your own statements or tax returns, or to rely
upon foreign financials when making investment
decisions, securing credit or using foreign
outsourcing firms. CPAs in industry may find
themselves dealing with foreign subsidiaries or
working for a subsidiary of a foreign company.
As CPAs, you have expectations about
language, currency, accounting practices, methods
and presentation when reading and analyzing U.S.
GAAP statements. When dealing with foreign or
transnational statements—even if they are presumed
to be prepared using U.S. GAAP—be ready to adjust
your expectations.
KNOW COMMON APPROACHES
When providing statements to foreign users,
companies adopt a variety of approaches based on
factors such as language, currency and accounting
practices. These cover the spectrum from not
changing the primary foreign statement at all to
preparing primary statements using U.S. GAAP (see
exhibit 1). The specific approach may not be
obvious and may vary from year to year. The
options include:
Doing nothing. If a
company chooses to provide its primary statements
without making any changes, it often will be
apparent because the statements will be written in
a foreign language.
Primary statements under U.S. GAAP.
Many foreign companies choose to
prepare primary statements using U.S. GAAP.
Convenience translation.
Companies may translate the language
into English, but provide no information about the
accounting practices and currency. Volvo’s balance
sheet in exhibit 2 is an example of a convenience
translation. The currency is the Swedish krona
(SEK) and the format does not follow U.S.
GAAP.
|
Behind
the
Numbers | Common approaches foreign
businesses take when providing financial
statements to U.S. investors/creditors.
Approach | Language
| Currency |
Accounting principles |
Selected items reconciled to
U.S. GAAP | Statements
reconciled to U.S. GAAP
| Do nothing |
Foreign* | Foreign*
| Foreign | No
| No |
Primary statements prepared
under U.S. GAAP |
English | U.S. |
U.S. GAAP | N/A
| N/A |
Convenience translations
| English |
Foreign | Foreign
| No | No
| Convenience
statements | English
| U.S. | Foreign
| No | No
| Limited
restatements | English
| U.S./Foreign |
U.S./Foreign | Yes
| No |
Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP
(Minimum required by SEC–Form
20-F) | English |
U.S./Foreign |
U.S./Foreign | Yes
| Yes |
Secondary
statements—country-specific for
U.S.**/ Secondary
statements—universal |
English/Commonly in English
| U.S./ U.S. or foreign
| U.S. GAAP/ May use
IFRS/IAS | N/A/ No |
N/A/ No
| *The
term foreign does not preclude the
possibility that English may be spoken,
the company’s primary reporting language
may be English, the primary reporting
currency may be the U.S. dollar or the
foreign company’s statements may be
prepared using U.S. GAAP.
**Meets SEC requirements.
|
Convenience statements.
These contain translated language
and, often, converted currency. They still lack
information CPAs need about accounting practices,
the translation method and how the currency was
converted. Do not assume they are in or comparable
with U.S. GAAP. Even large companies may choose to
use convenience statements. Suzuki Motor Corp.,
for example, prepares statements that show both
Japanese yen and U.S. dollars. Amounts are
converted to U.S. dollars at the year-end exchange
rate.
Limited restatements.
These attempt to provide more
information by reconciling some significant items
to U.S. GAAP. Critics argue they allow companies
to selectively choose items that improve their
financial picture.
Reconciling to U.S. GAAP.
Companies that cross-list their
stock on foreign and U.S. exchanges must, at a
minimum, prepare a reconciliation of their
home-country statements to U.S. GAAP. These
companies file Form 20-F in lieu of Form 10-K with
the SEC; the filings are available on the SEC Web
site at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml
.
Secondary statements.
These may be country-specific or
universal. A U.S. country-specific secondary
statement would be prepared using U.S. GAAP;
universal statements may use International
Accounting Standards/International Financial
Reporting Standards (IASs/IFRSs). (See “ Understanding IASs and
IFRSs. ”)
|
Volvo
Group Balance Sheet
for 2005 |
Consolidated
balance sheet December 31
| |
| | Volvo
Group |
SEK M | 2004 |
2005
|
Assets
| |
| Intangible
assets | 17,612 |
20,421 |
Property, plant and
equipment | 31,151 |
35,001 |
Assets under operating
leases | 19,534 |
20,839 |
Shares and participations
| 2,003 | 751
| Long-term
customer-financing receivables
| 25,187 | 31,184
| Long-term
interest-bearing receivables
| 1,741 | 1,433
| Other long-term
receivables | 6,100
| 7,021 |
Inventories | 28,598
| 33,937 |
Short-term
customer-financing receivables
| 26,006 | 33,282
| Short-term
interest-bearing receivables
| 1,643 | 464
| Other short-term
receivables | 29,647
| 35,855 |
Marketable securities |
25,955 | 28,834
| Cash and cash
equivalents | 8,791
| 8,113 |
Total Assets
| 223,968
| 257,135
| |
| |
Shareholders’
equity and liabilities
| |
| Shareholders’
equity 1 |
70,155 | 78,768
| Provisions for
post-employment benefits |
14,703 | 11,986
| Other provisions
| 14,993 | 18,556
| Loans |
61,807 | 74,885
| Other
liabilities | 62,310
| 72,940 |
Shareholders’
equity and liabilities
| 223,968
| 257,135
| |
| |
Shareholders’
equity and minority interests
as percentage of total assets
| 31.3%
| 30.6%
|
1 Whereof minority interests
SEK 260 M (229).
|
|
Understanding
IASs and
IFRSs International
Accounting Standards (IASs)
were issued by the
International Accounting
Standards Committee (IASC)
from 1973 to 2000. Although
the IASC Foundation continues
as the parent body of the
International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB), in
2001 the IASB took over the
IASC’s standard-setting
activities. The IASB has
amended some IASs and proposed
to amend others, proposed to
replace some IASs with new
International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
and adopted or proposed
certain new IFRSs on topics
for which there were no
previous IASs. Through
committees, both the IASC and
the IASB also have issued
interpretations of standards.
Financial statements may not
be described as complying with
IFRSs unless they comply with
all the requirements of each
applicable standard and
interpretation.
Source: Deloitte’s IAS Plus
Web site, www.iasplus.com/standard/standard.htm
.
| |
DETERMINE THE APPROACH
If the reporting approach is not disclosed
in the notes or referred to in the auditor’s
report, CPAs can contact the company and make a
detailed inquiry. The lack of notes to the
financial statements explaining how they were
prepared may show a lack of accounting
sophistication on the foreign company’s part.
Even if the statements have been audited, be
aware that the sophistication and enforcement of
accounting rules vary significantly by country.
Some foreign accounting firms register with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
so they may conduct or participate in audits of
companies filing with the SEC; they therefore are
subject to PCAOB rules and oversight. About
one-third of the more than 1,500 public accounting
firms listed on the PCAOB Web site (www.pcaobus.org)
are foreign. More than 90 countries
permitted or required their domestic-listed
companies to report under IFRSs in 2005, and the
list is growing rapidly. Summaries of IFRSs are
available at www.iasplus.com/standard/standard.htm.
Although the summaries are inherently incomplete,
they offer a quick read for the beginner. Be
cautious, since implementation and enforcement of
IFRSs vary from country to country. An updated
list of adoption status by country is available at
www.iasplus.com/country/useias.htm.
Although Japan and the United States have
not yet adopted IFRSs, both have committed
significant resources toward international
convergence. For the United States, progress is
being made on harmonization under an agreement
between FASB and the IASB. Significant
differences, however, remain between IFRS and U.S.
GAAP.
|
Bridging
the Culture GAAP
The foreign financial
statements you’re examining
may have been prepared using
U.S. GAAP, but was it applied
in the same way it would have
been in the United States?
“In a lot of cases,
probably not,” says Gregory S.
Miller, CPA, a professor at
Harvard Business School.
“Conservatism [in financial
reporting] is driven by the
litigation environment.” Even
if a foreign company is
cross-listed on a U.S.
exchange, it does not run the
same risk of investor lawsuits
as a U.S.-based company.
Furthermore, research suggests
there are country-specific
biases, Miller says. For
example, a company in Germany
is far more likely than a
company in Italy to interpret
the same results negatively.
Paul Neubelt, CPA,
chairman of BDO
International’s China region,
agrees that accounting
principles are applied
differently according to the
culture of the country where
the statements are prepared.
“Anyone looking to invest in
another country needs to know
something about the cultures
of the country,” he says. That
caution extends to choosing
your own translators, who can
explain the meaning behind the
words. Changes to U.S.
GAAP may present other
problems with financial
statements of foreign
companies. “A company may say
it knows U.S. GAAP and may
have someone on staff who has
lived in the United States,
but it’s often not up to
date,” Neubelt says.
Even if you hire an expert
in the country in question,
ultimately you’ve got to have
the courage and conviction
that you understand the
numbers yourself, Miller says.
“The same [cultural] factors
that make it difficult to
understand the accounting can
make it difficult to
understand a local
consultant.”
—Matthew G. Lamoreaux is a
senior editor of the
JofA . Mr. Lamoreaux
is an employee of the AICPA,
and his views, as expressed
in this article, do not
necessarily reflect the
views of the Institute.
Official positions are
determined through certain
specific committee
procedures, due process and
deliberation.
| |
WATCH FOR PRESENTATION
DIFFERENCES
Some countries present items differently.
For example, the Volvo balance sheet in exhibit 2 lists long-term
assets before short-term assets and shareholders’
equity before liabilities. This format is
consistent with the IAS-compliant model financial
statements for 2005 available at www.iasplus.com/fs/2005modelfs.pdf.
CPAs also should seek information about accounting
practices such as the grouping or netting of
accounts and the definition of current vs.
noncurrent. These types of differences make it
important to read the footnotes and to obtain
country-specific information. Information
about doing business in specific foreign countries
can be obtained from sources such as HLB
International (www.hlbi.com/DBI_list.asp)
and the Tax and Accounting Sites Directory (www.taxsites.com).
HLB International is a global network of
accounting firms and business advisers whose Web
site includes information on currency and
languages, investment factors, business
organizations and taxation. The Tax and Accounting
Sites Directory provides links to a variety of
other international information Web sites.
It’s also important to know whether a company’s
foreign statements reflect historical cost or
contain inflation adjustments. Two common models
for inflation adjustment are the general
price-level-adjusted (GPLA) model and the current
cost-adjusted (CCA) model. Information about the
accounting methods and presentation rules may be
disclosed in the supplemental information included
with the statements. If the information is
difficult to locate, a source of last resort may
be the accounting principle disclosures or the
reconciliation to U.S. GAAP in the statements of
multinational corporations based in that country.
Do not assume common accounting terms have
the same meaning outside the United States. For
example, although some companies in the United
Kingdom have adopted IFRSs, many continue to use
terminology that can be confusing to CPAs in the
United States (see exhibit 3). |
U
.K. vs.
U.S. Reporting
Terminology |
U.K. terminology
| U.S.
equivalent or
definition |
Accounts
| Financial
statements |
Debtors |
Accounts
receivable |
Hire charges
| Rent
| Stocks
| Inventories
|
Turnover | Sales and
other operating income
|
Source: BP’s 2004 Annual
Report.
| |
DETERMINE THE CURRENCY
The currency used in the
financial statements may not be obvious, as shown
in exhibit 2 . The SEK M
above the “Assets” caption shows the statements
are in the Swedish krona. Remember that Canada,
Australia and Jamaica also call their currency
“dollars” and many currencies use the familiar $
symbol. Translated financial statements
are meaningful only if the reader knows the method
used to convert foreign currencies to U.S.
dollars. A basic convenience statement may be
prepared by multiplying all the amounts on the
income statement and balance sheet by the
translation rate in effect at the balance sheet
date. In that case there would not be any
translation gains or losses, and the statements
would not provide any information about the
effects of rate changes over time.
Multinational enterprises have been dealing
with translation issues for many years because
their foreign divisions and subsidiaries often
keep records in the local currency. Exhibit 4
lists four common methods of translation. Each
uses a different combination of the following
three rates: the historical rate in effect on the
date of the transaction, the rate in effect at the
end of the current year and the weighted average
rate for the period.
Translation rules are addressed by FASB
Statement no. 52 in the United States and by IAS
21 in the international standards. Current and
historical exchange rate information is available
from Web sites such as the Federal Reserve Bank
(www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H10/hist)
or the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/).
|
Understand the common
approaches foreign companies take
when they provide statements to
users in the United States.
Understand the
effects of currency translation
on financial statements and the
common conversion methods.
Become familiar
with IASs/IFRSs, since more than
90 countries have adopted these
international standards.
Line up sources of
help in advance.
| |
Many accounting firms belong to international
networks or alliances to expand their resources.
Your domestic CPA firm may be able to help arrange
for an accounting firm in the foreign country to
provide assistance in interpreting the financial
statements. Exhibit 5, contains a list of some of
the larger networks and alliances that provide
international resources to accounting firms.
|
CPA
Firm
Networks and
Alliances |
Baker Tilly
International, www.bakertillyinternational.com
BDO
International, www.bdointernational.com
BKR
International, www.bkr.com
CPA
Associates
International, www.cpaai.com
CPAmerica
International, www.cpamerica.org
DFK International, www.dfkintl.com
GMN
Enterprise, www.gmnen.com
HLB
International, www.hlbi.com
IGAF
Worldwide, www.igafworldwide.org
Moores
Rowland International,
www.mri-world.com
NACPAF,
National Associated
CPA Firms, www.nacpaf.com
PKF North
American Network, www.pkfnan.org
RSM
McGladrey Network, www.rsmi.com
| | |
The global integration of national economies is
well under way and will accelerate over the next
two decades. The result is that U.S.-based CPAs
will see more financial statements originating in
foreign countries. Foreign investment in the
United States also is likely to increase, and many
financial executives in the United States may soon
be required to report results in compliance with
IFRSs. As progress is made in convergence and
harmonization between FASB and the IASB, the
interpretation of foreign financial statements
should become easier. CPAs who develop expertise
in the international reporting arena will be in
increasingly high demand. |