- column
- Top Line
Internal Audit: A Rebalancing Act
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2006. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
No Results
TOPICS
-
Uncategorized Article
SURVEY SAVVY
Even by year two of SOX compliance, companies expected their internal audit departments would not devote as much time to such efforts as they had in year one. Only 7% anticipated spending three-quarters of their time on compliance compared with 38% in the first year, 43% expected the internal audit groups to spend from one-fifth to one-half of their time on such activities in the second year and 24% assumed SOX would take less than one-fifth of departmental time overall in year two. A number of respondents anticipated some realignment of responsibilities in 2006. Half said the audit committee would likely have an oversight role in their rebalancing efforts. The companies expected many benefits to accrue from these efforts, including more appropriate coverage of risk (30%); reduced costs of section 404 and section 302 compliance (18%); and expansion of internal audit’s ability to perform more traditional audits (18%). |