- column
- From the Tax Adviser
How to Apply Joint Estimated Tax Payments When Filing Separately
A straightforward answer to a thorny question.
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2004. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
Almost 1,400 IRS employees receive layoff notices, adding to staff losses
IRS ends Direct File, shifts focus to Free File upgrades and private sector
Real estate tax changes that advisers need to understand
TOPICS
| married couple who has filed jointly in the past—and made joint estimated income tax payments for the current tax year—may decide to file separately for that year. This could arise, for example, with a couple who was separated by the end of the tax year but had no legal separation agreement or divorce decree at that time. (Such an agreement or decree would allow only for filing single, not married filing separately). With so many married clients moving toward divorce, the question of how to allocate the joint payments can come up again and again; CPAs are well-advised to know the answer. ALLOCATION RULES Example 1. Husband H’s 2004 tax bill, using married filing separately filing status, is $16,000; wife W’s 2004 tax bill, using the same filing status, is $24,000. Their total 2004 estimated tax payments were made married filing jointly and totaled $22,000. They agree to divide the payments evenly. Thus, H and W can each apply $11,000 of the payments to their 2004 tax bills. Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that H and W do not agree on an allocation ratio. Thus, under regulations section 1.6015(b)-1(b), 40% ($16,000/$40,000) of the $22,000 total payment, or $8,800, applies to H; 60% ($24,000/$40,000), or $13,200, applies to W. CURRENT IRS POLICY PLANNING If the parties can’t reach an agreement, the spouse who made the actual payments should consider attaching an explanatory statement to the return and providing copies of any documentation (for example, canceled checks) showing the amounts were from bank accounts titled only in the payer’s name.
Advertisement
For more information see the Tax Clinic, edited by Allen Beck, in the October 2004 issue of The Tax Adviser. —Lesli S. Laffie, editor
|
