- column
- Letters
Misidentification Noted
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2003. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
No Results
TOPICS
-
Uncategorized Article
The Tax Brief “ More Clarification on 1031 Exchanges ” ( JofA , Jun.03, page 83) needs clarification. On November 25, 2002, the Internal Revenue Service released revenue ruling 2002-83 in Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB) 2002-49. (It can be found in CCH’s Standard Federal Tax Reporter, vol. 19, pp. 78, 199-24 and 78, 199-25, 2002.)
The article misnamed the ruling as a procedure. It had us in the right town, wrong street. Other than that, it was functionally correct.
William Edwards, CPA
Veltri, Edwards & Associates, PA
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Author’s reply: The term “revenue procedure” was inadvertently used. The IRS released Revenue Ruling 2002-83, not Revenue Procedure 2002-83.
Also, the correct term for TAM should be Technical Advice Memorandum 9748006, not Tax Advice Memorandum (page 84).
Ron Raitz, CCIM
Real Estate Exchange Services Inc.
Marietta, Georgia
