- column
- TAX MATTERS
Line Items
Please note: This item is from our archives and was published in 2000. It is provided for historical reference. The content may be out of date and links may no longer function.
Related
IRS warns taxpayers: Social media advice can lead to costly penalties
Global tax deal could hurt US companies, says letter requesting OECD guidance
Treasury posts preliminary list of jobs eligible for no tax on tips
Media Circus Caused Lower Property Values But Not a Loss
The court disallowed the deduction because there was no actual physical damage to the taxpayers’ property ( Chamales v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2000-33). IRS’s Fax to Workplace Didn’t Violate Privacy Act
Options Transferred in Divorce Considered Income
In field service advice no. 200005006, the IRS concluded that the stock options were exchanged for the release of marital rights or property. Therefore the transfer was at arm’s length and subject to IRC section 83, which states stock options are taxable when transferred. The service said the ex-husband had compensation income equal to the fair market value of the options on the date of transfer. Also, when the ex-wife exercised the options, there were no tax consequences to either party. However, when she sells the stock, the ex-wife will be taxed on the difference between the stock’s selling price and her basis (the carryover basis from the ex-husband plus her exercise price).
Advertisement
The IRS anticipated that the ex-husband might wish to argue that IRC section 1041 shields him from tax. Section 1041 prevents gains from being taxed on a transfer to a former spouse incident to a divorce, so the Service noted the ex-husband’s compensation was ordinary income and not a “gain.” 1998 Tax Refund Not Credited Against 1989 Taxes
The U.S. Supreme Court recently sided with the service. In Baral v. United States (S. Ct. 2-22-00), 85 AFTR 2d 2000463, the Court relied on IRC section 6511 (b)(2)(A), which states that “the amount of the credit or refund shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid within the period immediately preceding the filing of the claim, equal to 3 years plus the period of any extension of time for filing the return.” According to this “lookback” rule, the taxpayer missed the deadline because the relevant payment period covered only February 1, 1990, through June 1, 1993. The Court held that since no portion of the tax was paid during this period, no tax credits would be allowed. Relying on Ford v. United States, 618 F.2d 357 (1980), the taxpayer had argued the withholding and estimated tax payments were merely “deposits” and not tax payments until he filed his income tax return on June 1, 1993. The Supreme Court disagreed and held that IRC section 6513(b) required that the withholding and estimated taxes be considered paid on April 15, 1989, which was outside the lookback period. —Michael Lynch, CPA, Esq., |