US Bank Regulators Support Basel III


The U.S. federal banking agencies issued a statement supporting the Basel III accord reached on Sunday. The regulators said they “actively supported” the efforts of the G-10 Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS) and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to increase the quality, quantity and international consistency of capital, strengthen liquidity standards, discourage excessive leverage and risk taking, and reduce procyclicality in regulatory requirements.

 

The regulators, which include the Federal Reserve, the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC, said Basel III sets the stage for key regulatory changes to strengthen the capital and liquidity of large multinational banks. Basel III will require banks to hold top-quality capital totaling 7% of their risk-bearing assets, up from just 2% under current rules. The rules may require banks to raise hundreds of billions of dollars of fresh capital over the next decade.

 

The regulators said the transition period, which phases in the new requirements through Jan. 1, 2019, gives institutions the opportunity to implement the standards gradually, thus alleviating the potential for short-term pressures on the cost and availability of credit to households and businesses.

 

More from the JofA:

 

 Find us on Facebook      Follow us on Twitter

 

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

COLUMN

Deflecting clients’ requests for defense and indemnity

Client requests for defense and indemnity by the CPA firm are on the rise. Requests for such clauses are unnecessary and unfair, and, in some cases, are unenforceable.