AICPA clarifies conventions for reviews that follow SSARSs, other standards

The interpretation calls for additional statements in written reviews.

The AICPA issued a new interpretation to clarify a permissible reporting convention when a review is performed in accordance with the Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARSs) and with another set of review standards.

AR-C Section 90, Review of Financial Statements, requires that the written review report include a statement that the accountant's responsibility is to conduct the review engagement in accordance with the SSARSs.

Newly issued Accounting and Review Services Interpretation No. 1 to AR-C Section 90 states that a practitioner may also indicate that the review was conducted in accordance with another set of review standards, provided that the review was conducted in accordance with both sets of standards in their entirety.

An example of an additional review standard that may apply is International Standard on Review Engagements 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements. Interpretation No. 1 also provides an illustrative report and is available at aicpa.org.

SPONSORED REPORT

A new line of business to consider

Technology assessments may open the door to new engagement opportunities for your firm. What is a technology assessment? How do you perform one? JofA Tech Q&A author J. Carlton Collins shows you in a detailed explanation.

FEATURE

Maximizing the higher education tax credits

A counterintuitive strategy can save taxes by including otherwise excludable scholarships in gross income.