Governments get guidance on split-interest agreements

GASB's standard affects recognition and measurement.

GASB issued new guidance for governments that benefit from irrevocable split-interest agreements.

A typical irrevocable split-interest agreement provides benefits to at least two beneficiaries—a government (often a public college, university, or hospital) and another beneficiary designated by the donor. The donor transfers the related assets either to the government or to a separate third party, such as a bank. Examples of these types of agreements include charitable lead trusts, charitable remainder trusts, and life interests in real estate.

GASB Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split-Interest Agreements, describes when these types of arrangements constitute an asset for accounting and financial reporting purposes when the resources are administered by a third party. Statement No. 81 also provides expanded guidance for circumstances in which the government holds the assets.

Under the standard, a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split-interest agreement is required to recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement.

In addition, the standard requires a government to recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split-interest agreements that are administered by a third party, if the government controls the present service capacity of the beneficial interests. Under the standard, a government is required to recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting period.

The standard takes effect for financial statements for reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2016, and is required to be applied retroactively. GASB encourages earlier application.

SPONSORED REPORT

The technology assessment engagement

Are you working with the best technology? Do you know how to help your clients determine if their technology stack measures up? In this free report, J. Carlton Collins, CPA, explains how to answer those questions via a technology assessment engagement.

FEATURE

Maximizing the higher education tax credits

A counterintuitive strategy can save taxes by including otherwise excludable scholarships in gross income.