CBT Too Easy? Think Again

BY JOSE M. JIMENEZ

The concerns about how easy the new CPA exam is, expressed in the letter “ CBT: Too Easy? ” ( JofA , Sept.05, page 12), are valid but unnecessary. I took the last paper and pencil exam in November 2003. The exam was very difficult, and I was able to get credit on only two parts. I finished the other two parts now computer-based in 2004 and became a CPA in 2005.

Having experienced both versions of the exam, I can tell you the CBT format is much more rigorous. Time pressures have increased, content has expanded and simulations have been added. You see an increase in passing rates because people now have time to focus on one part at a time. However, the trick is having the endurance and focus to pass the entire exam during an 18-month window. Not many people have the stamina required to study for the test that way. The result is that candidates with less capability are weeded out. The bottom line is that if the exam was easier you would not see the drop in candidates that followed its implementation.

The new CPA exam, as all previous versions, is challenging and serves well to protect the public and the profession.

Jose M. Jimenez, CPA
Horseheads, N.Y.

SPONSORED REPORT

Why cybercriminals are targeting CPAs

This free report expands on the most commonly found scams, why education and specialized IT knowledge help to lessen security vulnerabilities, and why every firm should plan carefully for how it would respond to a breach.

PODCAST

How tax reform — and Excel — are changing the CPA Exam

Mike Decker, the vice president of examinations at the AICPA, discusses changes being made to the exam as a result of tax reform — and about how Excel will now be available for use on the test.