Supreme Court to Hear Kentucky Muni Bond Case


The nation’s highest court agreed to hear a case that could decide whether the vast majority of states may continue giving discriminatory income-tax preference to in-state municipal bonds.

In Davis v. Department of Revenue, 193 S.W.3d 557 (2006), the Kentucky Court of Appeals agreed with the taxpayers’ argument that Kentucky’s income tax statutes, which assess income taxes on interest earned on out-of-state municipal bonds but exempt interest on in-state municipal bonds, violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. The state court said such discrimination is unconstitutional “economic protectionism” that is “designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.”

Kentucky, in its writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, based its argument, in part, on the decision by the Ohio Court of Appeals in Sharper v. Tracy , 647 N.E.2d 550 (1994), which said the Commerce Clause was not intended to apply to acts of one sovereign state trying to gain an advantage over another sovereign state. Tax laws in 38 states give such favorable treatment to in-state municipal bonds.

SPONSORED REPORT

Tax reform complicates year-end tax planning

Get your clients ready for tax season with these year-end tax planning strategies, which address how to make the most of recent tax law changes, such as the new deduction for qualified business income and the cap on the deductibility of state and local taxes.

VIDEO

What RPA is and how it works

Robotic process automation is like an Excel macro that can work on multiple applications, says Danielle Supkis Cheek, CPA. RPA can complete routine, repetitive tasks such as data entry, freeing up employee time from lower-level chores.