uditors need to understand a client’s corporate governance structure and management control philosophy and how these factors affect their preplanning (for example, client acceptance, business risk) and planning judgments (such as extent and timing of testing).
In this study, we asked 96 practicing auditors to evaluate a hypothetical case in which a client’s corporate governance and management control philosophy was either strong or weak. We adapted the case from COSO’s evaluation tools. As expected, the governance structure and management control philosophy affected both preplanning and planning judgments. For example, auditors were more likely to accept a potential client and to reduce substantive testing when those elements were strong. While our results were consistent with professional guidance, auditors did not rely more on interim testing, contrary to our expectations, when governance was strong. Overall, the results indicated that auditors were sensitive to a company’s corporate governance and management control philosophy.
For the full text, see Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Fall 2000, vol. 19, no. 2.
JEFFREY COHEN, CMA, PhD, is associate professor, Boston College, Carroll School of Management, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. His e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org . DENNIS HANNO, CPA, PhD, is associate professor of accounting, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.