Explain the Difference

BY STANLEY BALSKY

In “So That’s Why It’s Called a Pyramid Scheme” ( JofA, Oct.00, page 91) , the article states that, “during a review and compilation engagement for a small client....”

Will you please explain what a review and compilation engagement is? I thought we only had three levels of engagements and not a mix-and-match set.

If in our own publication we cannot keep it straight, how can we hope that non-CPAs will be able to?

Stanley Balsky, CPA
Rutherford, New Jersey

Author’s reply: In the article, the Nebraska CPA who discovered a large embezzlement at a small client’s business ( page 91 ) could have more accurately described his work. Looking back at the procedures the CPA performed, we can see the engagement was really a compilation with additional procedures as permitted by AR section 100.11–.12 (of Professional Standards ). It would not have been a SSARS no. 1 review engagement unless the CPA issued a review report. As you know, it’s not uncommon to perform review-type procedures on selected areas of the financial statements in this particular set of circumstances.

The main point was that the fraud was so obvious it was uncovered even without a thorough audit.

Joseph T. Wells, CPA, CFE
Austin, Texas

SPONSORED VIDEO

How KPMG is innovating the audit

KPMG's global audit team is using cognitive technology and alliances with tech and university partners to drive audit innovation. See how.

SPONSORED REPORT

States look to unclaimed property for revenue

This free report outlines the escheat process, common types of AUP, how different states are handling it and how companies can plan for potential audits and liabilities.