Another Look at FASB Interpretation 44

BY FRANK C. MINTER

A comment in “FASB Offers More Guidance on Stock Options” ( JofA, July00, page 18) suggests that the inability to reprice options could cause a company to lose all its employees if the value of its stock declines and is not likely to go up in the near future.

I have been involved with financial reporting issues on behalf of the Institute of Management Accountants for over 15 years and we, like most everyone else, were opposed to the FASB conclusions on recognition and measurement of stock compensation. However, as the board worked to clear up the many interpretive questions resulting from the continued use of APB Opinion no. 25, we participated in that due process as well.

I have never objected to the concept that repricing of options makes a fixed plan become a variable plan. That simply makes sense. Rather than reprice, all any company has to do is simply issue new options and leave the “underwater” ones on the table. I realize sometimes that requires the action of stockholders to approve additional shares, but if the action is appropriate, there should be no problem with stockholders.

Frank C. Minter, CPA
Birmingham

SPONSORED REPORT

2018 financial reporting survey: Challenges and trends

Learn the top reporting challenges that emerged in a survey of more than 800 finance, accounting, and compliance professionals across the world, and compare them with your organization's obstacles.

PODCAST

How the skill set for today’s CFO is changing

Scott Simmons, a search expert for large-company CFOs, gives advice for the next generation of finance leaders and more, including which universities are regularly producing future CEOs and CFOs.