100% testing vs. sampling.


Statements made in a recent article, "Take My Manual Audit, Please" (JofA, June98, page 33), could set a dangerous precedent for auditors. The author wrote that "audit software lends itself to conducting 100% testing—not just sampling—of client data" and went on to describe the benefits of 100% testing.

Replacing sampling procedures with 100% testing of all data could raise expectations for the audit to a level that I think is unacceptable.

Published articles could be a source of authoritative support, and, if the author's views are followed, this could elevate testing standards to a level of practice that practitioners may not choose, or may be unable, to follow.

Our standard audit report tells the statement user, "An audit includes examining, on a test basis." The word test is intended to denote sampling rather than 100% testing. If the standards are to be changed, let the standard setters do it.

Charles Chazen, CPA
Los Angeles

SPONSORED REPORT

States look to unclaimed property for revenue

This free report outlines the escheat process, common types of AUP, how different states are handling it and how companies can plan for potential audits and liabilities.

PODCAST

Using drones to enhance audits

Hermann Sidhu, CPA, global assurance digital leader at EY, walks us through EY’s exciting new project to use drones to help audit large warehouses and outdoor inventories.