New procedures for amending returns to claim PATH Act depreciation changes

By Sally P. Schreiber, J.D.

In Rev. Proc. 2016-48, the IRS issued guidance for taxpayers to take advantage of a number of tax provisions that had expired at the end of 2014 but were retroactively extended to the beginning of 2015 in December 2015. Specifically, the procedure addresses Sec. 179 expensing, bonus depreciation, and the election to take a credit against alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability in lieu of bonus depreciation for “round 5 extension property.”

Sec. 179 permits a deduction for the cost of certain property placed in service during the tax year. The higher limits on this deduction ($500,000 expensing limit and $2 million phaseout threshold) were perpetually in danger of expiring as Congress did not make them permanent until it enacted the Protecting Americans From Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015, Division Q of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, P.L. 114-113. The PATH Act also retroactively reinstated the $250,000 limit on qualified real property for 2015.

Bonus depreciation, which permits taxpayers to elect to take a current deduction of a percentage (currently 50%) of the cost of property for the year it was placed in service had also expired, but it was not made permanent by the PATH Act. It was extended retroactively and through 2019 (and 2020 for certain property). A related provision allows taxpayers to elect to forgo bonus depreciation and instead claim an AMT credit.

Because the PATH Act was enacted after many taxpayers had filed their 2014 returns, they may not know how to take advantage of these tax changes. The revenue procedure provides the procedures taxpayers must follow.

For Sec. 179, the revenue procedure explains how taxpayers should treat a disallowed deduction for qualified real property. A taxpayer that treated the amount of a 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, or 2014 disallowed Sec. 179 deduction for qualified real property as property placed in service on the first day of the taxpayer’s last tax year beginning in 2014 may either continue its treatment of that property or, if the Sec. 6501(a) period is open, amend its federal tax return for the last tax year beginning in 2014 to carry over the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, or 2014 disallowed Sec. 179 deduction to any tax year beginning in 2015. However, if the taxpayer’s last tax year beginning in 2014 is open under Sec. 6501(a) and an affected succeeding tax year is closed, the taxpayer must continue to treat the amount of a 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, or 2014 disallowed Sec. 179 deduction as property placed in service on the first day of the taxpayer’s last tax year beginning in 2014.

For bonus depreciation, the revenue procedure applies to a taxpayer that did not claim the 50% additional first-year depreciation for some or all qualified property placed in service after Dec. 31, 2014, on its fiscal-year tax return beginning in 2014 and ending in 2015 or on its return for a short tax year of less than 12 months beginning and ending in 2015. The procedure explains what these taxpayers should do, depending on what choices they make with regard to bonus depreciation.

Finally, the revenue procedure permits taxpayers to elect to treat round 5 extension property (property eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act) as eligible for the AMT credit in lieu of bonus depreciation. The procedure explains how to do this and warns taxpayers that they must make the election in the first tax year ending after Dec. 31, 2014, even if they do not place any round 5 property in service in that year, if they wish to apply the election to property placed in service in a subsequent year.

Sally P. Schreiber (sschreiber@aicpa.org) is a JofA senior editor.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

QUIZ

News quiz: Scam email plagues tax professionals—again

Even as the IRS reported on success in reducing tax return identity theft in the 2016 season, the Service also warned tax professionals about yet another email phishing scam. See how much you know about recent news with this short quiz.