SEC proposal would require payback of incentive compensation awarded erroneously

By Ken Tysiac

The SEC proposed new rules Wednesday that would require executive officers of listed companies to pay back incentive-based compensation that they were awarded erroneously.

Proposed Rule 10D-1 would require listed companies to develop and enforce recovery policies in the event of accounting restatements. The proposal would affect current and former executive officers who receive incentive compensation that, based on the restatement, they would not have received.

Under the proposal, listed companies’ policies would “claw back” that unearned incentive compensation from current and former executive officers. Recovery would be required without regard to fault. Companies would be required to disclose the recovery policies and their actions under these policies.

“The proposed rules would result in increased accountability and greater focus on the quality of financial reporting, which will benefit investors and the markets,” SEC Chair Mary Jo White said in a news release.

The SEC now has completed proposals on all executive compensation rules required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, P.L. 111-203.

The clawback proposal would apply to incentive-based compensation that is tied to accounting-related metrics, stock price, or total shareholder return. Recovery would apply to excess incentive-based compensation received by executive officers in the three fiscal years preceding the date a listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement.

A listed company would be required to file its discovery policy as an attachment to its annual report. A listed company also would be required to disclose its actions to recover in its annual reports and any proxy statement that requires executive compensation disclosure if one of the following conditions is present:

  • During its last fiscal year a restatement requiring recovery of excess incentive-based compensation was completed, or
  • There was an outstanding balance of excess incentive-based compensation from a prior restatement.

Comment is due 60 days after the proposed rules are published in the Federal Register.

Ken Tysiac (ktysiac@aicpa.org) is a JofA editorial director.

SPONSORED REPORT

Gearing up for the new FASB lease accounting standard

Management accountants in the United States face significant challenges as companies prepare for the far-reaching change. This report looks at the standard, common challenges companies are likely to face and first steps to consider.

CHECKLIST

Being responsive to clients

CPAs and their firms have daily pressures and hectic schedules, but being responsive is crucial to client satisfaction. Leaders in the profession offer advice for CPA firms that want to be responsive to clients.

QUIZ

Learn to choose between ‘who’ and ‘whom’

Writers can stumble over who and whom (or whoever and whomever). If you write for business, this quiz can help make your copy above reproach.