FASB votes in favor of new consolidation standard

BY KEN TYSIAC

New accounting rules approved by FASB on Wednesday are designed to make financial reporting about consolidation more transparent and consistent.

FASB will issue the standard in the coming months, following the drafting of the final Accounting Standards Update (ASU).

All public and private companies that apply variable-interest entity (VIE) guidance will be affected by the ASU, as will limited partnerships and similar legal organizations such as limited liability corporations.

The new rules are intended to be less complex for limited partnerships and similar legal organizations. In addition, the rules are designed to simplify the consolidation guidance to focus more on principal risk, and remove the indefinite deferral available to certain investment funds.

The ASU will:

  • Change requirements for when a general partner consolidates a limited partnership.
  • Clarify when fees paid to a decision-maker (such as an asset manager) should be considered for VIEs when evaluating if a decision-maker is required to consolidate the VIE.
  • Reduce the complexity of the guidance for VIEs as it applies to related-party relationships such as affiliates.
  • Exclude certain money market funds from the guidance’s scope.


More information is available on FASB’s website.

Ken Tysiac ( ktysiac@aicpa.org ) is a JofA editorial director.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

COLUMN

Deflecting clients’ requests for defense and indemnity

Client requests for defense and indemnity by the CPA firm are on the rise. Requests for such clauses are unnecessary and unfair, and, in some cases, are unenforceable.