PCAOB reopens comment period on audit firm rotation concept release


The PCAOB has reopened its comment period regarding a debated concept release on auditor independence and audit firm rotation.

The original comment period closed Dec. 14. The new deadline is April 22, the PCAOB said Wednesday. The board extended the deadline to incorporate comments following a March 21–22 public meeting on the issue that will take place in Washington.

More than 600 comment letters on the issue already have been posted on the PCAOB’s website. An AICPA letter, dated Dec. 14 and signed by AICPA Chairman Greg Anton and President and CEO Barry Melancon, supported enhancing auditor independence and objectivity but opposed mandatory audit firm rotation. The AICPA letter said mandatory firm rotation would be costly and that research indicates it may have an adverse effect on audit quality.

Audit firm rotation has become a significant issue during the past eight months. In November, the European Commission proposed limiting the period in which an outside audit firm can perform audits for public companies to six years. A nine-year window would be allowed for companies opting for voluntary joint audits.

The 41-page PCAOB concept release document presents 21 questions that the board asks respondents to answer. The release says the board is particularly focused on weighing the advantages and disadvantages of audit terms of 10 years or greater.

In December, at the AICPA’s National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, PCAOB Chairman James Doty acknowledged that auditors generally oppose mandatory firm rotation, but asked constituents to think about whether there is a better solution.

Ken Tysiac ( ktysiac@aicpa.org ) is a JofA senior editor.

More from the JofA:

 Find us on Facebook  |   Follow us on Twitter  |   View JofA videos


News quiz: College debt, stolen identities, and retirement planning

See how much you know about these developments and others in the Journal of Accountancy news quiz.


Preventing and detecting fraud at not-for-profits

Organizations in all industries must deal with the potential for fraud to occur, and design controls to prevent and detect it. Environment, policies, and controls can help organizations steer clear of problems.


The dangers of dabbling

To meet evolving marketplace needs, CPAs often look to diversify their service offerings. Firms can mitigate the risk of experiencing competency-related professional liability claims by implementing these basic steps.