Taxpayers can deduct certain local lodging expenses under proposed rules

BY SALLY P. SCHREIBER

The IRS issued proposed regulations on Tuesday that permit employees to treat certain expenses paid or incurred for local lodging as deductible business expenses (REG-137589-07).

Under Sec. 262(a), living expenses paid or incurred when not traveling away from home are considered nondeductible personal expenses. However, in certain circumstances, the proposed regulations will allow local lodging expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a taxpayer’s trade or business to be deducted, depending on the facts and circumstances, one of which is whether the expense is incurred to satisfy a bona fide requirement imposed by the employer. Expenses that are lavish or extravagant under the circumstances will not qualify (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.162-31(a)).

Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.162-31(b) contains a safe harbor (and numerous examples illustrating the safe harbor) allowing a deduction for expenses for local lodging to attend business meetings and conferences if:

  • The lodging is necessary for the employee to participate fully in or be available for a bona fide business meeting, conference, training activity, or other business function.
  • The lodging does not exceed five calendar days and does not occur more than once each calendar quarter.
  • The employer requires the employee to remain at the activity or function overnight.
  • The lodging is not extravagant or lavish and does not provide a significant element of personal pleasure.


The proposed regulations specify that an employee’s costs for local lodging are personal expenses unless the expenses are deductible under Sec. 162 as ordinary and necessary business expenses (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.262-1(b)(5)). The preamble to the regulations explains that being an employee in itself can qualify as a trade or business.

Taxpayers do not have to wait for the proposed regulations to be finalized to rely on them. Taxpayers may apply the new rules to eligible local lodging expenses paid or incurred in tax years for which the statute of limitation on credit or refund has not expired (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.162-31(d) and Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.262-1(b)(5)). This means that taxpayers can file amended returns to seek refunds for tax paid on these expenses for years that are still open (three years from filing date/two years from payment of tax). A simplified version of these rules was already in effect under Notice 2007-47 (which is obsoleted by these regulations).

Sally P. Schreiber ( sschreiber@aicpa.org ) is a JofA senior editor.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

QUIZ

News quiz: Scam email plagues tax professionals—again

Even as the IRS reported on success in reducing tax return identity theft in the 2016 season, the Service also warned tax professionals about yet another email phishing scam. See how much you know about recent news with this short quiz.