FASB, IASB Announce New Disclosure Requirements on Offsetting


FASB and the IASB today issued investor-focused common disclosure requirements on the effect or potential effect of offsetting arrangements on a company’s financial position.

U.S. GAAP and IFRS differ on the criteria for offsetting, also known as netting. Offsetting presents net amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet as a result of an entity’s rights of set-off.

Neither IFRS nor U.S. GAAP previously required disclosure of all amounts set off in the balance sheet, and that prevented investors from comparing the rights of set-off between entities applying IFRS and U.S. GAAP.

Companies and organizations use rights of set-off as a risk management tool to reduce counterparty credit risk and manage liquidity risk. Enforceability of rights of set-off vary by contract and jurisdiction, according to an IFRS project summary.

U.S. GAAP allows companies to set off their derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the balance sheet if there is an agreement to set off, even if that right of set-off is only available in the case of bankruptcy or default. IFRS does not give companies that option.

This meant that a balance sheet prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP would generally present smaller amounts of these assets and liabilities than a balance sheet prepared in accordance with IFRS standards, the project summary states.

To address the differences, FASB and the IASB issued an exposure draft in January 2011 proposing new, joint criteria that were narrower than the current U.S. GAAP conditions. But after receiving feedback, the boards chose to retain their existing offsetting models and instead issue new disclosure requirements to allow investors to better compare financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP.

The new rules will require entities to disclose gross amounts subject to rights of set-off, amounts set off in accordance with the accounting standards followed, and the related net credit exposure, according to the IASB. The boards concluded that this will help investors understand the extent of set-off in a balance sheet and the effects of rights of set-off on the entity’s rights and obligations. The requirements are intended to improve transparency in the reporting of how companies mitigate credit risk, including disclosure of related collateral pledged or received.

“The expanded disclosures are responsive to the feedback we received from investors, who wanted to understand both the gross and net amounts for items offset in accordance with legally enforceable netting arrangements,” FASB Chairman Leslie Seidman said in a statement. “We are also requiring expanded information about the collateral pledged in these arrangements.”

The disclosure requirements take effect for annual periods beginning Jan. 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective application will be required to maximize comparability between periods.

More from the JofA:

 Find us on Facebook  |   Follow us on Twitter  |   View JofA videos

SPONSORED REPORT

Questions to ask before committing to the cloud

Cloud computing has its pros and cons. In this report, we answer common questions CPAs may have as they consider transitioning partially or fully to the cloud.

QUIZ

News quiz: IRS reopens an online service, but criticism endures

The IRS brings back the Get Transcript Online service, but the agency faces criticism for its handling of the aftermath of the event that led to the shutdown of the service. See how much you know about other recent news with this quiz.

CHECKLIST

Auditing risks in culture

Cultural flaws can seriously damage an organization. Here’s how internal auditors can reduce risks by embedding culture audits into existing audit programs.