Tax Aspects of Contributing a House to a Fire Department


Local fire departments often deliberately burn existing structures as a training exercise. New firefighters can practice their skills and techniques, knowing in advance that the structure is uninhabited. Often individuals will donate an old property, possibly even a former residence, to the local fire department. Obviously, where possible, taxpayers would like to take a charitable contribution deduction for their donation.


The first and most important point to note when considering the tax implications is that there is a significant difference between donating the house itself to the fire department and giving the fire department the right to use the house for training purposes. In the latter case, IRC § 170(f)(3)(A) specifically states that “a contribution by a taxpayer of the right to use property shall be treated as a contribution of less than the taxpayer’s entire interest in such property.” As a result, no charitable contribution is allowed. (See also Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-7(a)(1).)


To get a charitable contribution deduction for the fair market value of the property, the taxpayer must contribute the house itself to the fire department. (This item does not discuss the substantiation and documentation rules required by section 170(f)(11).) In most situations taxpayers want to contribute only the property and not the underlying land. They are also concerned about deeding the property to the fire department and the related costs of doing so.


The regulations and IRS Publication 526, Charitable Contributions, contain no requirement for a transfer of a deed. In fact, a Tax Court decision supports this position. Scharf , TC Memo 1973-265, concerned tax years 1968 and 1969, and although it predates section 170(f)(3) (which was added to the Code by the Tax Reform Act of 1969, P.L. 91-172, effective for contributions after July 31, 1969), in the right circumstances it is still good law.


The case dealt with a “building … given by the [taxpayer] to the fire department partly for the purpose of having it burned down. The transfer was not evidenced by any deed or other formal conveyance.” The underlying land was not contributed.


The Tax Court agreed with the IRS that after the house was contributed and burned down, the taxpayer ended up with a more valuable tract of clear land than he had before the donation. The court nevertheless concluded that the benefit the taxpayer received was far less than the benefit the fire department received. As a result, the taxpayer was allowed a charitable contribution deduction equal to the house’s fair market value.



Taxpayers can obtain a charitable contribution deduction for the fair market value of property (that is, land improvements) donated to a fire department to be burned down. The deduction is allowed even when there is no formal deed recording the transfer and even when the underlying land is not transferred. The taxpayer needs to properly structure the transaction so that the property, and not just the right to use the property, is being donated.


Bernard Leibtag , CPA, MBA, is a partner at Gorfine, Schiller & Gardyn, PA, in Owings Mills, Md.


This article originally appeared in the November 2008 issue of The Tax Adviser , the AICPA’s monthly journal of tax planning, trends and techniques. AICPA members can subscribe to The Tax Adviser for a discounted price. Call 800-513-3037 or e-mail for a subscription to the magazine or to become a member of the Tax Section.



How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.


Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.


Deflecting clients’ requests for defense and indemnity

Client requests for defense and indemnity by the CPA firm are on the rise. Requests for such clauses are unnecessary and unfair, and, in some cases, are unenforceable.