- Changes may be coming for state and local governments in financial reporting for leases and for the reporting of activities in which they have a fiduciary responsibility.

GASB issued separate “Preliminary Views” documents on the subjects and is seeking public comment on each.

The Leases document, available at, includes proposals addressing accounting and financial reporting for lessees and lessors and is based on the principle that all leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset.

GASB is proposing that for leases longer than 12 months, lessee governments should report:

  • An intangible asset representing the government’s right to use the leased asset.
  • A corresponding liability for lease payments.
  • Amortization expense related to the leased asset, recognizing the asset amount as an expense over the term of the lease.
  • Interest expense related to the lease liability.

Under the proposal, government lessors for leases longer than 12 months would report:

  • A receivable for the right to receive payments.
  • A corresponding deferred inflow of resources to reflect resources related to future periods.
  • Lease revenue (and a corresponding reduction in the deferred inflow) systematically over the term of the lease.
  • Interest revenue related to the receivable.

The Financial Reporting for Fiduciary Responsibilities document, available at, relates to governments that act as a trustee or custodian in controlling assets that belong to others. GASB is seeking to enhance the consistency and comparability of when and how governments report their fiduciary activities in their financial statements.

If approved, the fiduciary responsibility proposal would:

  • Define when a government has a fiduciary responsibility and is required to present fiduciary fund financial statements.
  • Clarify financial reporting requirements for fiduciary responsibilities, including a requirement for business-type activities that serve in a fiduciary capacity.
  • Introduce the use of a financial statement that reports the inflows and outflows of resources for all fiduciary types.

GASB Chairman David Vaudt said the proposed changes would give governments and their auditors clearer guidance for determining which activities should be reported in fiduciary funds—and clarify in which type of fiduciary fund the activities should be reported.

“This proposal would provide financial statement users with needed information regarding both general and special-purpose governments, including business-type activities such as public universities, hospitals, and utilities, which generally have not reported their fiduciary activities in the past,” he said.

Comments on each proposal are sought by March 6 and can be made at GASB will hold public hearings on both preliminary views proposals April 8 in New York City; April 9 in Irving, Texas; and April 10 in Los Angeles.


- GASB member Jan Sylvis was named the board’s vice chair, a position that existed early in GASB’s history but recently was retired.

The appointment, which took effect Jan. 1, was announced by the board of trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), which oversees GASB and FASB.

FAF reinstated the vice chair position in response to the increasing demands on the time of the GASB chair. A strategic focus on expanding outreach to stakeholders was part of the reason for reinstating the vice chair position


Year-end tax planning and what’s new for 2016

Practitioners need to consider several tax planning opportunities to review with their clients before the end of the year. This report offers strategies for individuals and businesses, as well as recent federal tax law changes affecting this year’s tax returns.


News quiz: Retirement planning, tax practice, and fraud risk

Recent reports focused on a survey that gauges the worries about retirement among CPA financial planners’ clients, a suit that affects tax practitioners, and a guide that offers advice on fraud risk. See how much you know with this short quiz.


Bolster your data defenses

As you weather the dog days of summer, it’s a good time to make sure your cybersecurity structure can stand up to the heat of external and internal threats. Here are six steps to help shore up your systems.