Research and experimentation expenditures clarified

BY ALISTAIR M. NEVIUS

With enhanced definitions and numerous additional examples, final regulations issued in July (T.D. 9680) clarify research and experimentation (R&E) expenditures under Sec. 174 that may be deducted currently or capitalized and amortized.

Under the final regulations, the ultimate success, failure, sale, or use of a product is not relevant to a determination of eligibility under Sec. 174 (Regs. Sec. 1.174-2(a)(1)). Even if production has begun, as long as uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of the product has not been eliminated, costs can still be R&E expenditures.

The final regulations refine the definition of a pilot model as any representation or model of a product produced to evaluate and resolve its uncertainty about the product during the product’s development or improvement. The pilot model may be a fully functional representation or model of the product or component of the product (Regs. Sec. 1.174-2(a)(4)).

The final regulations add a new subsection addressing components of a product, explaining that uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of one or more of its components does not necessarily indicate uncertainty as to other components or the product as a whole (Regs. Sec. 1.174-2(a)(5)). Therefore, even if uncertainty of an overall product’s general design has been resolved, a taxpayer can consider uncertainty surrounding one or more of its components to determine whether those components' costs qualify as R&E expenditures.

To illustrate these changes, the final regulations add 11 examples illustrating the definition of R&E expenditures and the treatment of pilot models, components, and revisions to existing products and processes. Notable points include:

  • Material and labor costs incurred to build a pilot model, as well as costs incurred to use the pilot model for R&E purposes, qualify as R&E expenditures.
  • A pilot model can be constructed for a component of a product.
  • Any number of pilot models may be constructed.
  • If a pilot model is later sold or put to an unrelated use, this does not preclude treating the initial cost of constructing the model as an R&E expenditure.
  • Costs of creating a variation to an existing product can be R&E expenditures if available information regarding the existing product does not resolve the uncertainty related to creating the variation.
  • Costs of testing a new process may qualify as R&E expenditures.
  • When a subcontractor performs both R&E and production activities, the costs incurred by the taxpayer for the R&E portion of the work can qualify as R&E expenditures under Sec. 174. The costs related to production cannot.
  • If an asset is created for which no R&E expenditures were incurred but is then used for R&E relating to a different product, then the depreciation expense arising from that asset is a deductible R&E expenditure.


For more, see “Revisions Clarify R&E Expenditures Regs. for Taxpayers,” by Sarah Lovinger, CPA, in the November 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.

Alistair M. Nevius, editor-in-chief,
The Tax Adviser

Also look for articles on the following topics in the November 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser:

  • How qualified longevity annuity contracts fit into clients’ financial plans.
  • What trust and estate fiduciaries need to know about the net investment income tax.
  • The most important factors the IRS now considers for granting innocent spouse equitable relief.

 

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

QUIZ

News quiz: Scam email plagues tax professionals—again

Even as the IRS reported on success in reducing tax return identity theft in the 2016 season, the Service also warned tax professionals about yet another email phishing scam. See how much you know about recent news with this short quiz.