Decanting trusts


Sometimes after clients create an irrevocable trust, circumstances change and the trust needs to be amended to reflect those changes. Sometimes these changes are related to family events, such as the marriage, divorce, or even death of the beneficiary; sometimes the client wants a new fiduciary or to have the trust resident in a state with more favorable laws.

Traditionally, depending on how the trust was drafted, clients may have been stuck with the irrevocable decisions made when the trust was created. However, increasingly, a technique known as “decanting” is being used to move a trust’s assets into a new or existing trust with different terms and conditions.

Under the trust decanting technique, the assets of the original, or distributing, trust are transferred to a new, or receiving, trust. A trustee’s ability to decant a trust depends on the trustee’s powers under the trust instrument and local law. States that permit trust decanting generally allow it as long as the trustee has discretionary distribution powers that can be exercised in favor of the trust’s beneficiaries.

Twenty-one states have adopted trust decanting statutes. They differ from one another in terms of what powers the trustee must have in order to decant the trust assets. Arguably, a common law power to decant exists whenever the trustee has authority to invade the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. However, trustees who attempt decanting in states without a statute run the risk of having the decanting disallowed by a court.

The IRS is studying the tax implications of trust decanting and asked for comments in Notice 2011-101, but it has not yet issued guidance. The IRS noted facts and circumstances that might have a tax effect, including:

  • Changes to the beneficiary’s rights to or interest in trust principal or income;
  • Addition of new beneficiaries;
  • Addition, deletion, or change to beneficial interests;
  • Transfers from a grantor to a nongrantor trust;
  • Changes in the identity of the donor or transferor for gift or generation-skipping transfer tax purposes.

In June 2012, the AICPA submitted comments to the IRS addressing the issues raised in Notice 2011-101. The AICPA recommended that when a trust is decanted, the receiving trust should be viewed as a continuation, rather than a termination, of the distributing trust. This is administratively simpler—the new trust does not need to obtain a new employee identification number, file two tax returns for one year, or complete Schedules K-1 to transfer tax attributes from the distributing trust to the receiving trust.

For a detailed discussion of the issues in this area, see “The Mechanics of Decanting,” by Audrey Young, J.D., in the April 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.

Alistair M. Nevius, editor-in-chief
The Tax Adviser

Also look for articles on the following topics in the April 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser:

  • A look at recent developments in individual taxation.
  • A discussion of cost segregation.
  • An analysis of how the net investment income tax applies to U.S. citizens living abroad.


Year-end tax planning and what’s new for 2016

Practitioners need to consider several tax planning opportunities to review with their clients before the end of the year. This report offers strategies for individuals and businesses, as well as recent federal tax law changes affecting this year’s tax returns.


News quiz: Retirement planning, tax practice, and fraud risk

Recent reports focused on a survey that gauges the worries about retirement among CPA financial planners’ clients, a suit that affects tax practitioners, and a guide that offers advice on fraud risk. See how much you know with this short quiz.


Bolster your data defenses

As you weather the dog days of summer, it’s a good time to make sure your cybersecurity structure can stand up to the heat of external and internal threats. Here are six steps to help shore up your systems.