Decanting trusts

BY ALISTAIR M. NEVIUS

Sometimes after clients create an irrevocable trust, circumstances change and the trust needs to be amended to reflect those changes. Sometimes these changes are related to family events, such as the marriage, divorce, or even death of the beneficiary; sometimes the client wants a new fiduciary or to have the trust resident in a state with more favorable laws.

Traditionally, depending on how the trust was drafted, clients may have been stuck with the irrevocable decisions made when the trust was created. However, increasingly, a technique known as “decanting” is being used to move a trust’s assets into a new or existing trust with different terms and conditions.

Under the trust decanting technique, the assets of the original, or distributing, trust are transferred to a new, or receiving, trust. A trustee’s ability to decant a trust depends on the trustee’s powers under the trust instrument and local law. States that permit trust decanting generally allow it as long as the trustee has discretionary distribution powers that can be exercised in favor of the trust’s beneficiaries.

Twenty-one states have adopted trust decanting statutes. They differ from one another in terms of what powers the trustee must have in order to decant the trust assets. Arguably, a common law power to decant exists whenever the trustee has authority to invade the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. However, trustees who attempt decanting in states without a statute run the risk of having the decanting disallowed by a court.

The IRS is studying the tax implications of trust decanting and asked for comments in Notice 2011-101, but it has not yet issued guidance. The IRS noted facts and circumstances that might have a tax effect, including:

  • Changes to the beneficiary’s rights to or interest in trust principal or income;
  • Addition of new beneficiaries;
  • Addition, deletion, or change to beneficial interests;
  • Transfers from a grantor to a nongrantor trust;
  • Changes in the identity of the donor or transferor for gift or generation-skipping transfer tax purposes.


In June 2012, the AICPA submitted comments to the IRS addressing the issues raised in Notice 2011-101. The AICPA recommended that when a trust is decanted, the receiving trust should be viewed as a continuation, rather than a termination, of the distributing trust. This is administratively simpler—the new trust does not need to obtain a new employee identification number, file two tax returns for one year, or complete Schedules K-1 to transfer tax attributes from the distributing trust to the receiving trust.

For a detailed discussion of the issues in this area, see “The Mechanics of Decanting,” by Audrey Young, J.D., in the April 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.

Alistair M. Nevius, editor-in-chief
The Tax Adviser

Also look for articles on the following topics in the April 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser:

  • A look at recent developments in individual taxation.
  • A discussion of cost segregation.
  • An analysis of how the net investment income tax applies to U.S. citizens living abroad.

SPONSORED REPORT

Revenue recognition: A complex effort

Implementing the new standard requires careful judgment. Learn how to make significant accounting judgments and document them and collaborate with peers for consistent application.

TECHNOLOGY Q&A

How to create maps in Excel 2016

Microsoft Excel 2016 has two new mapping capabilities. J. Carlton Collins, CPA, demonstrates how to make masterful 2D and 3D maps in Excel 2016.

QUIZ

News quiz: Economy and health care changes top CPAs’ list

CPA decision-makers’ economic outlook and the House Republicans’ proposed tax changes as part of replacing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act received attention recently. See how much you know with this short quiz.