Final regs. clarify who is subject to 50% limit on meal and entertainment expenses

BY SALLY P. SCHREIBER, J.D.

The IRS issued final regulations clarifying which party is subject to the 50% limit on deductible meal and entertainment expenses under Sec. 274(n) (T.D. 9625). The final rules adopt proposed regulations (REG-101812-07) issued in July 2012 without substantive change.

As the IRS emphasized in the preamble to the earlier proposed regulations, only one party is intended to be subject to the limitation, and there has been controversy over who is subject to it when multiple parties are involved. Also, in the preamble, the IRS explained that the proposed regulations were intended to settle issues raised in Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc., 461 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir. 2006), rev’g 123 T.C. 154 (2004); acq. in result, Rev. Rul. 2008-23.

Sec. 274(a) limits the amount of entertainment expenses that are deductible, and deductions for meals and entertainment are generally limited to 50% of the expenses incurred (Sec. 274(n)). Under Sec. 274(e)(2)(A), employers are not subject to the limitation to the extent they treat the expenses as compensation to employees.

Sec. 274(e)(3) provides two exceptions from the Sec. 274(a) limits for reimbursed expenses. Sec. 274(e)(3)(A) excepts expenses a taxpayer pays or incurs in performing services for another person under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement where the employer does not treat the reimbursement as compensation to the employee. In that case, the employee does not have additional compensation or a deduction for the expense, but the employer deducts the expense and is subject to the deduction limit. If the employer treats the reimbursement as compensation, the employee may be able to deduct the expense as an employee business expense. In that case, the employee bears the expense and is subject to the deduction limit. The employer deducts the expense as compensation, which is not subject to the deduction limit under Sec. 274.

Sec. 274(e)(3)(B) applies if the taxpayer performs services for a person other than an employer and the taxpayer accounts (substantiates, as required by Sec. 274(d)) to that person. The Eighth Circuit applied this subsection in the Transport Labor case. In that case, the taxpayer, a leasing company that provided truck drivers to its clients, charged the clients for the wages and the per diem allowance it paid the truckers. Because the taxpayer provided services to its clients under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement and accounted to the clients, it qualified under Sec. 274(e)(3)(B) for the exception from the Sec. 274(n) limit with respect to the per diem expense, and instead the clients were subject to the limit.

The final regulations contain a new definition of reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement for purposes of Sec. 274(e)(3), independent of the definition for accountable plan purposes in Sec. 62(c). The regulations also clarify that the rules for applying the exceptions to the Secs. 274(a) and (n) deduction limits apply to reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements with employees, whether or not a payer is an employer. Any party that reimburses an employee is a payer and bears the expense if the payment is not treated as compensation and wages to the employee.

The regulations also permit parties in arrangements involving nonemployees (i.e., independent contractors) to provide by agreement who is subject to the 50% limit. Absent an agreement, the limit applies to an independent contractor if he or she does not account for the expense under Sec. 274(d), and to the client or customer if the independent contractor meets the substantiation requirements. The regulations also include an example illustrating how the rules apply to multiparty reimbursement arrangements. Multiparty reimbursement arrangements are separately analyzed as a series of two-party reimbursement arrangements.

The final regulations apply to expenses paid or incurred in tax years beginning after Aug. 1, 2013.

  T.D. 9625

By Sally P. Schreiber, J.D., a JofA senior editor.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

QUIZ

News quiz: Scam email plagues tax professionals—again

Even as the IRS reported on success in reducing tax return identity theft in the 2016 season, the Service also warned tax professionals about yet another email phishing scam. See how much you know about recent news with this short quiz.