A Pink Slip and a Vest


In a revenue ruling, the IRS further standardized a benchmark it first proposed in 1991 for determining when a partial termination of a defined contribution retirement plan under IRC section 411(d)(3)(A) has occurred. The provision comes into play often when employers downsize, as in the scenario of the ruling, 2007-43, which was released in June. Under the statute, a termination or partial termination of a qualified plan results in the immediate vesting of all affected employees. Corresponding regulations provide only a facts-and-circumstances standard for determining how many layoffs constitute a partial termination. “So vague a regulation is no help to anyone,” said the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Matz v. Household International Tax Reduction Investment Plan , 94 AFTR 2d 2004-6781 (2004). The court reached back 13 years for a benchmark in an amicus brief filed by the IRS in another case. In the earlier case, Weil v. Retirement Plan Administrative Committee , 67 AFTR 2d 91-1131 (2nd Circuit, 1991), the IRS said a partial termination may be presumed to have occurred when severance turnover is at least 20% of participating employees. In the recent revenue ruling, the IRS applied that standard to an employer that closed one of its four business locations, laying off 23% of its plan participants.

SPONSORED REPORT

Keeping client information safe in an age of scams and security threats

A look at the Dirty Dozen tax scams and ways to protect taxpayer information.

TAX PRACTICE CORNER

More R&D tax help

"Can I use the R&D credit?" PATH Act enhancements make the credit more attractive to a wider range of taxpayers.

QUIZ

Learn to choose between ‘who’ and ‘whom’

Writers can stumble over who and whom (or whoever and whomever). If you write for business, this quiz can help make your copy above reproach.