CPAs Prescribe AMT Relief


Congress should repeal the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) or at least reform it, said Joseph W. Walloch, incoming chair of the AICPA’s technical resource panel on individual income tax. Walloch, along with other CPAs and taxpayers, testified in March before a House Ways and Means subcommittee to the AMT’s complexity and widening reach, with an estimated one-fourth of individual taxpayers subject to it this year unless Congress acts. David A. Lifson, president-elect of the New York State Society of CPAs, also called for repeal or overhaul, and Jon A. Nixon, CPA, a partner in Katzman Weinstein and Co. LLP of Bethpage, N.Y., described how the AMT fetters small businesses.

Short of abolishing the AMT, Walloch told Congress, it should adopt AICPA recommendations, including:

Increase and index for inflation the AMT brackets and exemption amounts, eliminate phase-outs and exempt regular-tax adjusted gross incomes under $100,000.

Set a single AMT tax rate below the regular-tax 25% bracket.

Allow certain regular-tax deductions, exemptions and credits barred or limited by the AMT, including the standard deduction, personal and dependent exemptions, and itemized deductions for medical expenses and state and local taxes.

Exclude the AMT from the estimated-tax penalty.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

COLUMN

Deflecting clients’ requests for defense and indemnity

Client requests for defense and indemnity by the CPA firm are on the rise. Requests for such clauses are unnecessary and unfair, and, in some cases, are unenforceable.