Research Summary 23: Reputation Does Matter

Perception of a client’s integrity affects audit decisions.
BY PHILIP R. BEAULIEU

uditors’ judgments about a client’s integrity have a domino effect on their audit decisions—first on risk evaluation, then on the extent of audit evidence collection and ultimately on audit fees. Auditors are leery of clients with whom they have no track record. Our study revealed that when auditors thought a client’s reputation was not squeaky clean, they collected more audit evidence than usual and, in turn, charged more for taking the trouble.

The perception of client integrity also colors whether auditors believe their clients. This is known as source credibility, a reflection of a client’s combined risk—inherent risk and internal control risk. Inherent risk is the probability that an account or transaction contains material misstatements, regardless of the controls in place. Internal controls run the gamut—protecting the effectiveness and efficiency of a company’s operations, the reliability of its financial reporting and its compliance with laws and regulations. Low source credibility increases the probability that a company’s financial statements might not stand up under scrutiny.

We provided 63 Canadian audit partners with information about a potential audit client, including snapshots about the CFO’s integrity. For example, the CFO was either respected or not respected in the local business community. We asked the participants to judge business and combined risk, and to recommend audit extent and fees based on that risk.

Finally, we asked the auditors to judge the CFO’s integrity. The participants associated low integrity with higher levels of inherent and internal control risks. As a result, they made an association among the high risks and an increase in the extent of audit evidence gathered and fees.

The key finding of the study showed that auditors recognized the potential impact of a client’s reputation on risk and collected more data to compensate for less-than-ideal clients.

For the full text of the research paper, see “The Effects of Judgments of New Clients’ Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence and Fees,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, September 2001, vol. 20, no. 2.

PHILIP R. BEAULIEU, PhD, is associate professor, Faculty of Management, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His e-mail address is pbeaulie@ucalgary.ca .

This series is based on work published in Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. The intent is to bridge the gap between researchers and practitioners by offering concise practice summaries of cutting-edge research in the field of auditing.

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

QUIZ

News quiz: Scam email plagues tax professionals—again

Even as the IRS reported on success in reducing tax return identity theft in the 2016 season, the Service also warned tax professionals about yet another email phishing scam. See how much you know about recent news with this short quiz.