100% testing vs. sampling.


Statements made in a recent article, "Take My Manual Audit, Please" (JofA, June98, page 33), could set a dangerous precedent for auditors. The author wrote that "audit software lends itself to conducting 100% testing—not just sampling—of client data" and went on to describe the benefits of 100% testing.

Replacing sampling procedures with 100% testing of all data could raise expectations for the audit to a level that I think is unacceptable.

Published articles could be a source of authoritative support, and, if the author's views are followed, this could elevate testing standards to a level of practice that practitioners may not choose, or may be unable, to follow.

Our standard audit report tells the statement user, "An audit includes examining, on a test basis." The word test is intended to denote sampling rather than 100% testing. If the standards are to be changed, let the standard setters do it.

Charles Chazen, CPA
Los Angeles

SPONSORED REPORT

How to make the most of a negotiation

Negotiators are made, not born. In this sponsored report, we cover strategies and tactics to help you head into 2017 ready to take on business deals, salary discussions and more.

VIDEO

Will the Affordable Care Act be repealed?

The results of the 2016 presidential election are likely to have a big impact on federal tax policy in the coming years. Eddie Adkins, CPA, a partner in the Washington National Tax Office at Grant Thornton, discusses what parts of the ACA might survive the repeal of most of the law.

COLUMN

Deflecting clients’ requests for defense and indemnity

Client requests for defense and indemnity by the CPA firm are on the rise. Requests for such clauses are unnecessary and unfair, and, in some cases, are unenforceable.