New method for determining who gets Sec. 199 deduction under contract manufacturing arrangements

BY ALISTAIR M. NEVIUS, J.D.

The IRS issued new guidance to examiners in its Large Business & International (LB&I) Division regarding how to determine which taxpayer is entitled to claim the Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction in a contract manufacturing arrangement (LB&I-04-0713-006). The directive replaces earlier guidance (LB&I-4-0112-001) issued last year, which had used a nine-question test to determine whether a taxpayer conducting production activities under a contract manufacturing arrangement with an unrelated third party meets the benefits-and-burdens-of-ownership requirement outlined in Sec. 199. The new guidance allows the parties to the arrangement to certify which has the benefits and burdens of ownership.

Sec. 199 allows taxpayers to deduct a specified percentage of the lesser of (1) qualified production activities income resulting from specified domestic production activities; or (2) taxable income determined without regard to the Sec. 199 deduction. For 2010 and later tax years the specified percentage is generally 9% (Sec. 199(a)(1)).

When taxpayers enter into a contractual arrangement with an unrelated party to perform some or all of the production activities potentially qualifying for the deduction, it can be unclear which party is entitled to the deduction. (The rules governing the tax treatment of these arrangements under Sec. 199 stipulate that only one taxpayer may claim the Sec. 199 deduction for a particular activity.)

Under Regs. Sec. 1.199-3(f)(1), only the taxpayer that has the benefits and burdens of owning the property during the period the qualifying activity occurs is entitled to claim a Sec. 199 deduction for that property. However, determining which party has the “benefits and burdens” of ownership can be complex.

To simplify the determination, the IRS in 2012 issued a directive telling its examiners to use a three-step process, each step containing three “yes” or “no” questions. The steps looked at contract terms, production activities, and economic risks. The new directive simplifies the examiner’s job even further, by replacing the nine-question test with three taxpayer statements:

  1. An explanation of the basis for the taxpayer’s determination that it had the benefits and burdens of ownership in the year or years under examination;
  2. A certification (using a form included in the directive) signed by the taxpayer; and
  3. A certification (using another form included in the directive) signed by the counterparty.

In general, taxpayers will be required to supply the benefits-and-burdens and certification statements within 30 days of when an information document request is issued regarding the Sec. 199 deduction.

  LB&I Directive LB&I-04-0713-006

By Alistair M. Nevius, J.D., the JofA’s editor-in-chief, tax.

SPONSORED REPORT

Questions to ask before committing to the cloud

Cloud computing has its pros and cons. In this report, we answer common questions CPAs may have as they consider transitioning partially or fully to the cloud.

QUIZ

News quiz: Experts offer guidance on accounting standards

Take this short quiz to see how much you know about the news, including a couple of SEC announcements, and facts cited in the guidance experts have offered on accounting standards.

CHECKLIST

Auditing risks in culture

Cultural flaws can seriously damage an organization. Here’s how internal auditors can reduce risks by embedding culture audits into existing audit programs.